From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-123727-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QSwhl-00065Q-UK
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:40:18 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C2351C0B8;
Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:38:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81351C0B8
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:38:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so2401916fxm.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
:content-type;
bh=zYz3wf6s+taiM5S51WZmUHa6Z4Xu4BoAAj/1OmxGH3k=;
b=AatclxbVmD47qoydGYhzeez7xVw0NNWp2DmqWQ9/kWhcRR60r0D5J/7JRToi6bWwZD
XkjnG0L8kDpVskrrSYYsS2izm6vrkhBwdJswIdgFV+TcTBEJwibRb6dDoT3sacacnrfk
pK6yzEwBJaBqHuzqTTHHfHdwmLe24VNT7DcF4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
b=Ft1gd47wI4tmWoozoX4WlXngxN5T8Ug0mA4ZC2ChcBuJQMRhJh3cdLGGsOdgVzScBT
8xGX3Sz4bwMbMoS9/HIrAlNa9d/SDJyy6jG9Q8a3N8hMnXIDOBgHUwZ6aHNOWZYXghvD
g/OqvciPcv/FALiFbjUJbamJL6zdg28CLyNNw=
Received: by 10.223.40.85 with SMTP id j21mr438400fae.22.1307216334806;
Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC75222.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.82.34])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b25sm848914fab.4.2011.06.04.12.38.53
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:38:52 +0200
Message-ID: <2630798.FqQb8rvnce@localhost>
User-Agent: KMail/4.6 rc1 (Linux/2.6.39.1; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <4DEA80A8.5060609@badapple.net>
References: <61A321C6-5D7C-49CE-B87B-3E4180958D22@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <20110604184342.GB23349@gaurahari.merseine.nu> <4DEA80A8.5060609@badapple.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 837f1fafffe9f1a2778296788ac7a734
On Saturday 04 June 2011 11:59:52 kashani wrote:
> On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi
> >> did opine
> >>
> >> thusly:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote:
> >>>> I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like
> >>>> top
> >>>> posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are
> >>>> using won't let them reply any other way.
> >>>>
> >>>> I just wonder if there is some setting that could be changed
> >>>> somewhere
> >>>> to make it work correctly with usenet, or whatever you were using.
> >>>
> >>> As soon as Alan said it was me, I thought of the difference between
> >>> usenet and email headers and that mail2news gateway. It actually
> >>> shouldn't be hard to workaround, but having already worked around a
> >>> couple of other issues with it I'm ready to just use the email like
> >>> "normal folks" and be done fooling with it. :)
> >>
> >> FWIW,
> >>
> >> If I set kmail to display just routine ordinary threaded mail there's
> >> a lot less thread breakage. It's not all gone, but it is considerably
> >> less.
> >>
> >> Setting kmail to display threads based on "activity" - whatever the
> >> blazes that is - breaks things wholesale. I haven't managed to narrow
> >> it down at all so I have no idea what the algorithm is.
> >>
> >> Looks like there's more to this than just usernet<->mail gateway
> >> brokenness
> >
> > I'd switch if *mutt* was breaking threading for other people, but I'm
> > pretty sure it isn't. Now kmail and the other pointy-clicky-html-loving
> > apps, *those* I don't trust... Tried 'em, found 'em wanting. ;)
> >
> > It would be good to hear from more people running different MUAs,
> > but IMO mutt is the Gold Standard and is almost certaily doing what it's
> > supposed to do.
>
> Whatever you're using is breaking threading in Thunderbird and I can't
> think of anyone else lately I've had the problem with. Also mutt has
> broken threading in the past and even between different versions of
> itself... so calling it a gold standard may be an overstatement.
it is golden brown, runny and smelly. Some call it 'gold'.
--
#163933