Jason, That's totally weird. Couple things that could cause this -- try disabling any composting window managers you may have running to see if that makes a difference. Also, is your computer stressed out (100% cpu usage) when you view the page? I've noticed that, among other things, GUIs in general tend to crap out (lots of repeated/trailing graphics) when the CPU gets pegged -- could be caused by Flash, or alpha transparencies in CSS, Java, or anything really... You may want to submit that screen shot as a bug to http://bugzilla.mozilla.org and see if they can recommend anything. Interesting screen shot though! - Brian On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Jason Messerschmitt < jasonmesserschmitt@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Justin Findlay wrote: > >> On AD 2008 July 02 Wednesday 02:20:30 PM -0400, doki_pen wrote: >> > +2 on firefox3. Faster, doesn't slow down after long use. I really see >> > the difference with javascript. The engine is much faster. Just try a >> js >> > heavy page(like google apps). I haven't had any crashes. Only >> complaint >> > is that flash blocker(or maybe flash itself) doesn't always work. I >> have >> > to reload a couple of times to get youtube to work. Also, some plugins >> > haven't been ported yet. I compiled it, and here are my use flags: >> >> I've been using FF3 for about 2 months, and although many things have >> improved during the beta phase it is generally about as memory and CPU >> heavy as FF2. The only real improvement I've observed as far as >> performance is concerned is javascript. I wish there were a light >> version available. I've tried galeon and epiphany, but both lacked >> features that I really like in FF and now that there is a great amount >> of extensions available it is harder to justify using another browser. >> Maybe it's time to switch back to konqueror. >> >> >> Justin >> -- >> gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list >> > > I've noticed an odd visual glitch with blogspot pages- it superimposes my > desktop on some pages. It's a bit hard to explain so here's a pic. As far as > I know it's only this page, but might be good fodder for some of you > troubleshooters out there. > >