From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99831382C5 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7388BE0869; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F78E083B for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1lWeqY-0003c6-06 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:42:18 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can't install a new system Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:42:17 +0100 Message-ID: <2576492.mvXUDI8C0e@peak> In-Reply-To: <7898295.T7Z3S40VBb@peak> References: <4639677.31r3eYUQgx@peak> <20210408164705.4450a9bc@digimed.co.uk> <7898295.T7Z3S40VBb@peak> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 51ae6b36-6c5f-445f-89e9-d3081fe781b8 X-Archives-Hash: 4d066dcaab84b7c917cdb7b38329c8e9 On Monday, 12 April 2021 12:01:28 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > Okay, step by step. First I chose the basic make.profile, number 1, and > installed my base system set - everything that doesn't need a GUI. Then I > switched to the basic desktop profile, number 5 and ran a -uav @world. So > far so good, but then I attempted to install a basic set of GUI packages - > everything but a DE. The command was 'emerge -uav @xorg'. I got this: > > --->8 > > >>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0/work ... > > * Running prepare phase for all ... > * Running prepare phase for all ... > * Running source copy phase for ruby27 ... > > >>> Source prepared. > >>> Configuring source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0/work > >>> ... > > * Running configure phase for ruby27 ... > > >>> Source configured. > >>> Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0/work ... > > * Running compile phase for ruby27 ... > * Running compile phase for all ... > > >>> Source compiled. > > * Skipping make test/check due to ebuild restriction. > > >>> Test phase [disabled because of RESTRICT=test]: > >>> dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0 > >>> > >>> Install dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0 into /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/net- > > telnet-0.2.0/image/ > * Running install phase for ruby27 ... > Traceback (most recent call last): > 3: from :1:in `' > 2: from :1:in `require' > 1: from /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems.rb:16:in `' > /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems.rb:16:in `require': cannot load such file -- > rubygems/compatibility (LoadError) > * Unable to find the gems dir > * ERROR: dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0::gentoo failed (install phase): > * Unable to find the gems dir > --->8 > > There seems to be an inconsistency in the ruby packaging. Is there anything > I can do to evade it? I've attached the package-set files I use when > building a new system, for info. This doesn't happen in a stable system, only in ~amd64. It's consistent there, though, so I'm tempted to raise a bug report. -- Regards, Peter.