From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221D1138010 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 745E2E07B1; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.babbelbox.org (babbelbox.org [83.133.105.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF6E2E05D5 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16117 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2013 10:31:36 -0000 Received: from p54ae9c87.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO blacky.localnet) (sascha@babbelbox.org@84.174.156.135) by babbelbox.org with ESMTPA; 24 Mar 2013 10:31:36 -0000 From: Sascha Cunz To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail fails to do CNAME lookup for lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: <2566774.lYLBj0DYX0@blacky> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.1 (Linux/3.8.2-gentoo; KDE/4.10.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3212242.KDGSIWW1OA@blacky> References: <1482066.gRzS17GXcR@blacky> <1438505.vmiOQLkS9E@blacky> <3212242.KDGSIWW1OA@blacky> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Archives-Salt: 468fcb1c-31c5-4fb1-b724-c58391c4f70f X-Archives-Hash: 185222030a1e8d437706b430ad5145b0 Am Sonntag, 24. M=E4rz 2013, 01:39:17 schrieb Sascha Cunz: > Am Sonntag, 24. M=E4rz 2013, 00:46:56 schrieb Sascha Cunz: > [...] > > I've meanwhile found out that it might be related to a DNS lookup bug= inside > qmail and found an old patch that should addresses this issue. The pa= tch is > short and looking innocent to me, so I've now setup a local overlay a= nd am > trying to send this out without the smtproute, once again. >=20 > Sascha Okay, this last mail went through smoothly and without any trouble in l= og=20 files. Since I got private mails from others having the same problem, here's e= xactly=20 what I did to solve this: - Create a local overlay - copy the mail-mta/netmail directory from portage tree - wget http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch to the files directory. - copy netmail-1.06.ebuild to netmail-1.06-r1.ebuild - insert "epatch "${FILESDIR}"/qmail-103.patch" before the first epatch= in src_unpack() - rebuild manifest, add the overlay and rebuild netmail - restart svscan. This patch from Christopher Davis is actually dated back to 1998; I'm n= ot sure=20 about copyright issues on the patch, but it seems trivially simple. Though, I'm wondering why such a simple fix isn't already part of the n= etmail=20 ebuild. Sascha