From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754C11382C5 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DF74E0866; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0C53E0839 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost01d.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1kjJQw-0002EL-77 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:55:54 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] what's the difference between the emerge options -u and -n? Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:55:53 +0000 Message-ID: <2563578.mvXUDI8C0e@peak> In-Reply-To: <33fe67a0-640d-5964-b82c-af041f2233ae@web.de> References: <33fe67a0-640d-5964-b82c-af041f2233ae@web.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01d-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 377f8f3b-18d8-4363-80bf-3c3e1107cb4a X-Archives-Hash: a512e6d604f4118195f4b4b335c7ed4e On Saturday, 28 November 2020 20:00:01 GMT n952162 wrote: > Assuming no "emerge --sync" has been done, e.g. > > I've been using -u to mean, "don't update if there's nothing new" (which > I would actually think would be the default). Maybe that's wrong? -n > is better? ... or did you mean -N? -- Regards, Peter.