From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mcn63-0000AO-73 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:16:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90800E04A1; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wlym.com (wlym.com [66.135.63.43]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F55CE04A1 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (pool-70-109-54-11.clppva.fios.verizon.net [70.109.54.11]) (authenticated bits=128) by wlym.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n7GLGrD8017986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:16:56 -0500 Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7GLGoN2025002 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:16:53 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] trouble with preserved-rebuild In-reply-to: <200908162257.32322.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> References: <28884.1250443632@ccs.covici.com> <200908162128.30814.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <13434.1250451447@ccs.covici.com> <200908162257.32322.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Alan McKinnon message dated "Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:57:32 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.1.1 Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:16:50 -0400 Message-ID: <24965.1250457410@ccs.covici.com> From: covici@ccs.covici.com Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 282db11a-93fe-4c7d-b6b8-8e1e8f343728 X-Archives-Hash: 4f48ed66b606606d68646a632e6dd3e9 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Sunday 16 August 2009 21:37:27 covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > On Sunday 16 August 2009 21:18:01 covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > > > On Sunday 16 August 2009 19:27:12 covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > > > > > Hi. I am having problems with emerge @preserved-rebuild which used > > > > > > to work fine, but on the latest time I tried it, I got the > > > > > > following message: > > > > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > > > > > > > > > > > Calculating dependencies ... done! > > > > > > > > > > > > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-libs/apr-util:0". > > > > > > > > > > ^^^^^^ > > > > > There is no SLOT 0 for apr-util > > > > > > > > > > Use equery depends apr-util to find out what used it and rebuild > > > > > those. > > > > > > > > I did that and got the same results. > > > > > > what exactly did you do and what output did you get from equery? > > > > I emerged the packages mentioned in the equery -- I don't have the > > output, although I can do it now. > > > > * Searching for apr-util ... > > app-admin/apache-tools-2.2.12 (=dev-libs/apr-util-1*) > > dev-util/subversion-1.6.4-r10 (>=dev-libs/apr-util-1.3:1) > > www-servers/apache-2.2.12 (=dev-libs/apr-util-1*) > > > > I emerged the packages mentioned -- without using the version numbers > > and when I did the emerge @preserved-rebuild again I got the same > > results as before. > > portage somehow thinks you have apr-utils:0 installed, or need to have it > installed. Check the following: > > Is it in the world file? > Check versions and SLOTS for apr-utils in /var/db/pkg/ > Check the output of "eix -e apr-util" to see what exactly you have - keep in > mind that a package without a SLOT is 0 by default. I suspect the devs bumped > apr-util to SLOT=1 Well, I did have two versions in there -- there was a 0.9.12 and when I got rid of that things went back to normal -- its emerging 32 packages now. I deleted it from the world file as well. Thanks so much for your help. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com