From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E1F139083 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D474E1028; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B00E0F23 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eOXRI-0007Ll-MR for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:24:48 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory? Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:24:48 +0000 Message-ID: <2476103.saCjEblRYk@peak> In-Reply-To: <88b882e0-8d57-3b8f-2c08-9d0b9c1c68c5@youngman.org.uk> References: <6582741.F9gJHCEsXr@dell_xps> <20171210230802.GA26035@waltdnes.org> <88b882e0-8d57-3b8f-2c08-9d0b9c1c68c5@youngman.org.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 6865560f-97e2-4da7-8cf2-fbb1582a7d13 X-Archives-Hash: 854a4cd057f12efdf2e1eed817e5d40c On Monday, 11 December 2017 19:20:24 GMT Wol's lists wrote: > I more and more get the feeling that linux is standardising on the Gnome > desktop, which I really just DO NOT get on with. Nor I. it's second only to M$ in its arrogance. -- Regards, Peter.