From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R0z73-0002Y1-1W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:07:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0173321C2BF; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0828A21C2B6 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Sep 2011 17:03:17 -0000 Received: from p5B0843EA.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO pc.localnet) [91.8.67.234] by mail.gmx.net (mp065) with SMTP; 06 Sep 2011 19:03:17 +0200 X-Authenticated: #13997268 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19TkVQW+MlT7bapmkgWugr2B1E2oYPtCM7dcd+sol 1d76u/JjNlcMi9 From: Michael Schreckenbauer To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:03:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2474748.BxeZ24raHv@pc> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.0 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo; KDE/4.7.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20110906164339.GB9867@acm.acm> References: <87ehzuiu1y.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> <20110906164339.GB9867@acm.acm> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f08ef922db1d3c1b4d2ec1511d9b022a Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 16:43:39 schrieb Alan Mackenzie: > Is that right? How about it being saner to conform to standardised > interfaces, protocols and formats? How about IPP? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Printing_Protocol Oh wait... that's what cups is using. > No, the sane alternative is to use the `lpr' command, possibly augmented > by special arguments for particular spoolers, but always having a > fallback to standard `lpr'. That way, everybody's happy. Even me. ;-) How about the lpr command provided by cups? Does it not work for you? Michael