From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2C0138CC0 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5AD5E0962; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99271E0912 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet) by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYuF8-000Azz-KQ for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:33:30 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Broken localepurge Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:33:29 +0000 Message-ID: <2462754.iK4UmPefq3@wstn> Organization: Society for Retired Gentlefolk User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.18.7-gentoo; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2510304.ctvcemOTXj@wstn> References: <3491083.Z6cTiFtIb4@wstn> <1951716.cEms1kIQxd@navi> <2510304.ctvcemOTXj@wstn> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.80.10] X-Archives-Salt: eee6ad27-18c7-4e84-903e-80632a04dea9 X-Archives-Hash: 1fc42a23b2031bc0521291e71a015733 On Friday 20 March 2015 09:14:42 I wrote: > On Thursday 19 March 2015 11:15:55 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > > On Thursday, March 19, 2015 10:15:58 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: > > >Meanwhile, does anyone here have a ready fix? > > > > Looks like Jan-Matthias does. > > You can just apply the patch directly to the localepurge script. > > > > patch /usr/bin/localepurge localepurge-0.5.4-fix_option_parsing.patch > > Yes, I saw that and downloaded it, then tried calling it from the ebuild. > There are five other patches already, and I haven't yet found the right > place in the sequence to add this one. > > Still working on it... I found the problem: the line count was wrong in the patch file. Once I'd fixed that, all was hunky-dory. I've submitted the corrected patch to the bug report. -- Rgds Peter.