From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-149866-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCD21381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:40:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F206E0C35;
	Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:39:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (mail-la0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E90DE0C12
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:39:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ev20so1034094lab.36
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
        bh=jcWw2bS4Bfgh+nEWYarHq0LYMDW8Gt7iY6defY/EMJI=;
        b=lho1JR2Te3KFSXcJWlEbzuA6lc6c+Uw8rmSnnSTl20bYn2xwYUDVrh3tAm6b7+xrY2
         Fd0PubsldORuSm4aw+ga+6HNiWY8LibJAN1q5U0rVFqFhGzfQ034GtjNhfG5yHLfAC8Q
         Na64lr7LPkT8JvhPRCcCm1RUAf0REyJ1xQuqvHLO3is6II7Uo/IYx0/MftiNysqwfbhH
         a8igSMXl6QuG9vdvKueiMMyna8ISIGinrm3JcLRIVilfuLLGMYvxcpPEWsk8KBgpct0U
         JOw6FZj9p6DmEpmJfa02hrgprS8JU9qSu0GdRCboS+FEqfcrxIA+xRiGgCTemXClEKWs
         pfHA==
X-Received: by 10.152.2.130 with SMTP id 2mr122275lau.35.1377149988583;
        Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from melforce.localnet (melforce.xtsubasa.org. [2a02:578:5002:8062::2])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm4049181laf.7.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pavel Volkov <negaipub@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Jitsi or Other Skype Alternative
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:39:45 +0400
Message-ID: <2442424.Uyn9JsonI8@melforce>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11 (Linux/3.10.9-gentoomelf; KDE/4.11.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <5214E831.9060703@gentoo.org>
References: <20130820151232.GA2420@artifex> <20130821155919.GA10259@filip.loria.fr> <5214E831.9060703@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Archives-Salt: b1f1dc20-f3ec-45de-89ce-fafd97d1bbd9
X-Archives-Hash: 6e62cd74607d6ff813f2fdb201b1a282

On Wednesday 21 August 2013 18:17:53 hasufell wrote:
> The average java application is buggy, bloated and hard to maintain. And
> that is a fact you have to realize as a distributor.

Okay, then do you consider Jitsi average or not? I'm about to try it.