From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-119826-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1PnMQZ-0007Hh-3L
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:38:39 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8393DE095C;
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:37:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wlym.com (wlym.com [66.135.63.43])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D93E095C
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:37:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ccs.covici.com (pool-71-171-100-42.clppva.fios.verizon.net [71.171.100.42])
(authenticated bits=128)
by wlym.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p1A2b7Ah002385
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:37:09 -0600
Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ccs.covici.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1A2b4WA024161
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:37:07 -0500
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] possible portage or ebuild bug?
In-reply-to: <201102100141.52139.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
References: <1813.1297093290@ccs.covici.com> <201102090003.04886.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <201102100141.52139.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
message dated "Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:41:51 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.2.1
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:37:03 -0500
Message-ID: <24160.1297305423@ccs.covici.com>
From: covici@ccs.covici.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 57f8cbe0c927cf5176f7b26557727a26
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 00:03 on Wednesday 09 February 2011, Alan
> McKinnon did opine thusly:
>
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 17:41 on Monday 07 February 2011,
> >
> > covici@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> > > On trying my last world update with --deep and --newuse, etc. I get the
> > > following message:
> > >
> > > Calculating dependencies .. ........ done!
> > >
> > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=dev-libs/glib-2.27.5" have been
> > >
> > > masked.
> > >
> > > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> > >
> > > request:
> > > - dev-libs/glib-9999::gnome (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword)
> > > /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
> > > # Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org> (04 Feb 2011)
> > > # New glib/gtk+ mask, for testing purpose
> > > # Needs a new gvfs as well
> > >
> > > - dev-libs/glib-2.27.93::gnome (masked by: package.mask)
> > > - dev-libs/glib-2.27.93::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
> > >
> > > (dependency required by "x11-libs/gtk+-2.99.3" [ebuild])
> > > (dependency required by "media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r3[gtk]" [installed])
> > > (dependency required by "app-doc/doxygen-1.7.3[-nodot]" [ebuild])
> > > (dependency required by "media-libs/id3lib-3.8.3-r8" [installed])
> > > (dependency required by "media-sound/id3v2-0.1.12" [installed])
> > > (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
> > > (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
> > > For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge
> > > man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
> > >
> > > Now I tried the following in my package.mask with no difference:
> > > >=x11-libs/gtk+-2.25.0
> >
> > Do you have some gnome overlay installed? None of the high-versioned
> > packages you need (glib, gtk+) are in the regular tree.
>
> Looks like my sync yesterday was behind. Today's sync gives me the same error
> you got.
>
> Latest unstable gtk+-2.24.0 DEPENDS on >=dev-libs/glib-2.27.3 (hard masked).
> $PORTDIR/profiles/package.mask lists
>
> >=dev-libs/glib-2.27
> =x11-libs/gtk+-2.24
>
> So the gtk+ line is wrong. It should be either ">=" or version "2.24.0"
>
> Pacho fixed it http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354275 so a resync again
> should resolve your issue
>
>
>
>
> >
> > > So what am I missing here, or is something broke?
> > >
> > > Thanks much for any help you can give.
> >
> > My guess is something in the overlay depends on a version of gtk+ that
> > isn't in the overlay yet, except for the dev versions *99*. And those are
> > hard and keyword masked as usual for cvs/svn versions.
> >
> > resync the overlay, try again.
> > It's an overlay. It's certain to break once a day. Less than that is a
> > bonus.
Thanks much -- I had unmasked glib2.27.5, but I will get rid of that and
resync again -- did not really want to use that.
Thanks.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
covici@ccs.covici.com