From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D112138206 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7D6021C051; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 15:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03c.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03c.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.22]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A640E08B8 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 15:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost03c.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bUEyn-0003cu-I4 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:18:09 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Genlop oddity Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:18:09 +0100 Message-ID: <24102429.k4VL3MjEvs@peak> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.7.0-gentoo; KDE/4.14.22; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1590415.jsWEG1EJid@peak> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost03c-IP: [82.69.80.10] X-Archives-Salt: 65923b5d-645a-4f14-87e0-9314c23ad106 X-Archives-Hash: 1a2e8a65fb2b28dd7606eda5b61522c8 On Monday 01 Aug 2016 10:03:53 John Blinka wrote: > Glad to see that someone else has experienced the same thing, and I'm not > going crazy (although some might argue this is hardly proof...) No, but it'll do as a bit of evidence pro tem. :) -- Rgds Peter