From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B072F1384B4 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 09:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81F7721C021; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 09:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.20]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E87421C00A for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2015 09:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet) by smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a59Q8-00049v-9F for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 09:46:24 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Open RC problem? Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 09:46:23 +0000 Message-ID: <2402607.F2zU2P6NFZ@wstn> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.1.12-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20151204221150.32a9efa1@digimed.co.uk> References: <33706115.JSY9fdmmfA@wstn> <16661121.xL1SBozSY1@wstn> <20151204221150.32a9efa1@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost03a-IP: [82.69.80.10] X-Archives-Salt: 3a850414-c625-4193-93d9-f7da67031df3 X-Archives-Hash: 12043369b5d20410b263ce3276dd34ab On Friday 04 December 2015 22:11:50 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:05:49 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Thanks for the reply, Alan. I did some more poking around and found > > that removing zerotier-one and netmount from the default run-level > > fixed it. Or maybe it was just coincidence again - this box certainly > > does some odd things at times. > > Unlikely, because the RAID stuff is started in the boot runlevel, > whereas zerotier-one is in the default runlevel. Yes, I know. I'm clutching at straws here. I think this motherboard must have some kind of timing difficulty with my SSDs. -- Rgds Peter