public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Mozes <tomas.mozes@shmu.sk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] perl-5.20.1 - has anybody managed to upgrade Perl?
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:55:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23d1e2bced9d96e2449a87c611b21a96@shmu.sk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412696471.12590.0@numa-i>

On 2014-10-07 17:41, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 10:50:53 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
>> On 2014-10-07 10:13, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> dev-lang/perl-5.20.1 is in the tree (unmasked), but trying to upgrade
>>> gives me lots of blocks requiring versions which are not
>>> in the tree, yet, like
>>> 
>>> [blocks B      ] <perl-core/Socket-2.13.0 ("<perl-core/Socket-2.13.0"
>>> is blocking virtual/perl-Socket-2.13.0)
>>> 
>>> Has anybody tried to upgrade to this version of Perl?
>>> 
>>> Many thanks for some hints/comments,
>>> Helmut
>> 
>> emerge -av1 perl-cleaner
>> emerge -av1O dev-lang/perl
> 
> These two worked just fine, BUT
> 
>> perl-cleaner --all
> 
> fails miserably showing many blocks mentioning versions which are not
> in the (unstable) tree
> like, e.g.
> 
> perl-core/File-Spec-3.480.0 (and 28 more of those)
> 
> Typically there is virtual/perl-File-Spec-3.480.0 which requires
> perl-core/File-Spec
> of the same version, but (here) there is only
> perl-core/File-Spec-3.400.0
> 
> I wonder how all of you could get around this?
> 
> Many thanks for your help,
> Helmut

virtual/perl-File-Spec-3.480.0.ebuild:
RDEPEND="
         || ( =dev-lang/perl-5.20.1* ~perl-core/${PN#perl-}-${PV} )
         !<perl-core/${PN#perl-}-${PV}
         !>perl-core/${PN#perl-}-${PV}-r999
"

this says that's you don't need any perl-core of this, because if you 
have perl 5.20.1* then it's already included in dev-lang/perl itself.

Emerge all your virtual/perl* packages and they will unmerge perl-core 
packages that are already included in the dev-lang/perl and then run 
perl-cleaner again.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-07 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-07  8:13 [gentoo-user] perl-5.20.1 - has anybody managed to upgrade Perl? Helmut Jarausch
2014-10-07  8:31 ` Kerin Millar
2014-10-07  8:39   ` Kerin Millar
2014-10-07  8:50 ` Tomas Mozes
2014-10-07 15:41   ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-10-07 15:55     ` Tomas Mozes [this message]
2014-10-07 16:07     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-10-07 16:19       ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-10-07 16:32     ` covici
2014-10-07  8:53 ` covici
2014-10-07  9:22 ` Alan McKinnon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23d1e2bced9d96e2449a87c611b21a96@shmu.sk \
    --to=tomas.mozes@shmu.sk \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox