public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stroller <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support it?
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:07:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2323C479-222F-44CC-A9F8-73F87AE4FB31@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6461919.NtEmo2L7JZ@nazgul>


On 7 July 2011, at 08:30, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 07 July 2011 10:12:43 微菜 did opine thusly:
>> Devs can do what ever they think are right. Don't argue with them
>> unless you pay them. Want gtk2 support? Put your ebuild in your
>> personal overlay.
> 
> Gentoo users have developed a certain expectation over the years, 
> whereby devs will take user needs seriously and go to extra-ordinary 
> lengths to support everything under the sun.
> 
> That's what Gentoo does. That's how the system by and large works, and 
> that's what users have come to expect. It's unreasonable for a dev to 
> think they can willy-nilly change that based SOLELY on their own 
> opinion, as the greater community was not built around that behaviour.


LOL!

I'm afraid I have come to the expectation that a Gentoo dev's opinion is unswayable, like a mighty oak. If a Gentoo dev decides "this is the best way to do things" then you really have no chance of convincing him otherwise, IME. 

I have come to this conclusion over several years of bug reports and reading the gentoo-dev mailing list (though not recently). Anyone trying to appeal a bug report to that list for further discussion (as I have once done myself, as others have done and Nicos has kinda done here) will be characterised as "whining about a dev's decision" and told off for it.

Ubuntu users complain sometimes about similar things (such as Unity), about their bug reports being marked as WONTFIX, but their devs seem generally politer and more ready to explain their reasons than Gentoo devs. Discussing with a Gentoo dev has often felt to me like striking a hard rock wall.

Whilst I think Nicos is probably right, I have to say that I don't think he has done himself any favours here with comments #8 & #12. "I will reopen this [bug]. And I will keep reopening it indefinitely. Every time you close it, I will open it again." After being told by the dev not to! I mean, I think the problem is (probably) the dev's stubbornness, but that ain't going to win any friends and influence people.

A better thing to do, for instance, might have been to open another bug based on Nico's assertion that "gnome-mplayer looks ugly under KDE". You could add a screenshot for that, and even state that the fix is reinstating the GTK2 USE flag. But my experience is that arguing with a rock doesn't get you anywhere.

Stroller.



[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374057#c8




  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-07 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-06 16:35 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support it? Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-06 17:23 ` pk
2011-07-06 19:37   ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-06 20:02     ` pk
2011-07-06 20:41       ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-06 22:53         ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-07-06 23:06           ` Dale
2011-07-06 23:20             ` Peter Humphrey
2011-07-06 23:21             ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-07  3:04               ` Dale
2011-07-07 17:42     ` [gentoo-user] " Michael Orlitzky
2011-07-07 19:36       ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-07 20:01         ` Michael Orlitzky
2011-07-07 20:47           ` Dale
2011-07-07 20:57             ` Peter Humphrey
2011-07-07 21:03               ` Dale
2011-07-08  4:42           ` 微菜
2011-07-06 18:02 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-07-07  2:12 ` 微菜
2011-07-07  2:45   ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-07  3:31     ` 微菜
2011-07-07  7:30   ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2011-07-07 12:07     ` Stroller [this message]
2011-07-07 22:50       ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2011-07-07 23:40         ` Neil Bothwick
2011-07-07 16:44     ` [gentoo-user] " pk
2011-07-07 17:14       ` Mark Knecht
2011-07-07 23:52     ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-08 12:11 ` [gentoo-user] " Stroller
2011-07-08 13:14   ` Albert Hopkins
2011-07-08 15:19     ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-08 17:39       ` Stroller
2011-07-09  7:26         ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-09 14:02           ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-08 17:50       ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-07-08 19:06       ` [gentoo-user] " Albert Hopkins
2011-07-08 20:32         ` Stroller
2011-07-09 16:28       ` William Hubbs
2011-07-09 20:24         ` Alan McKinnon
2011-07-08 18:03     ` Stroller
2011-07-08 13:37   ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2323C479-222F-44CC-A9F8-73F87AE4FB31@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
    --to=stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox