From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC011383A1 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DC9321C0C0; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4B521C021 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id y2so1337304lbk.3 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:58:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=qxj+W0VJ4MtBDO8rglMCEWmuLWtFPXX+hJH132rKtEw=; b=05z0Q7QaV5HmSeEg1sZkjY6jArcfV58QEZPoTMLWcy0FK3D+Y4wefQ8wfC7RNdVe6b JJrv4rCGQyITcaU0HJKSSt5ypM6kEcZNayJChnqSuf5arYSY9n1wSqE3Sb6naquA/pw0 f1B6Yfz9Scfyy1MacvGWwULzRtVpNw77TIlvUxcHbflNu0QywVvxFfMpB79oTH/RbJp1 wNTrxqBTp2MMm+uIt5AN41b0t2Bt+n8Dy+mgov0yOsPOdVPQOVLdDAS0jcn1cqG5lzHj lwOrQhhQ3nl7ZUoUgz6SnEOiiMGhjrUDUqnxj19DSXAMaUflAWYKsCgbHPrQ9H1T82T9 ObLg== X-Received: by 10.152.125.7 with SMTP id mm7mr66879460lab.2.1357757932386; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:58:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC603C8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.3.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fb1sm24445625lbb.15.2013.01.09.10.58.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:58:51 -0800 (PST) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Alan McKinnon Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PATA vs SATA kernel driver (was: 4 machines - no /dev/cdrom or /dev/dvd anymore) Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:58:50 +0100 Message-ID: <23015928.dPnyqzQ1Rc@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.4.24; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20130109113203.0aea38c0@khamul.example.com> References: <50ED1969.3010309@st.com> <50ED3205.5050803@gmail.com> <20130109113203.0aea38c0@khamul.example.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" X-Archives-Salt: a53c9862-09f3-4776-ba20-9a0194141bbf X-Archives-Hash: 009344db1e69d55161b61e40bf402ba5 Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013, 11:32:03 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 03:01:57 -0600 >=20 > Dale wrote: > > Since this is > > depreciated, which generally means no longer maintained >=20 > >=20 > The word you want is "deprecated". >=20 > "depreciated" is something else entirely, it's what your employer doe= s > to the book value of your company car over 5 years to get the value > down to nothing. >=20 > wrong. To get the value down to 1=A4/$/whatever... so you can keep it i= n your=20 books. --=20 #163933