From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drive RPMs and data speed.
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:08:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2268258.3i3Eoas9dr@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+czFiADGabDdjDQYYyc8mTqC4SX7WG2rP=p0XzWjQLrOfzfFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am Freitag 28 Oktober 2011, 11:19:37 schrieb Michael Mol:
> (oi, it's getting harder and harder to snip this thing properly)
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 27 Oktober 2011, 16:00:09 schrieb Michael Mol:
> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> >>
> >> <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > Am Donnerstag 27 Oktober 2011, 15:17:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
> >> >> You've got six working drives of various sizes, models and
> >> >> firmware
> >> >> revisions. Good for you. I've got a still-functional 40GB IBM
> >> >> DeathStar. (It's not powered up right now, but it never failed
> >> >> on me
> >> >> after five years of use.)
> >> >
> >> > and I had 5 death stars failing on me.
> >>
> >> My point is that the numbers aren't what mattered here. My point is
> >> that SAMSUNG sold me a shoddy product, replaced it with another
> >> instance of the the same shoddy product, wouldn't replace it again,
> >> and never addressed a detailed technical report of a systemic problem
> >> in the same. Bad tech, bad customer service, and it looked like this
> >> was a more common scenario than among other manufacturers. All of it
> >> boiled down to a nasty case of being a bad candidate for spending time
> >> and money.
> >
> > Samsung replaced my two drives (one 500gb drive from a known shady
> > series and the SSD when the firmware overwrote itself) without any
> > fuss.
> >
> > Of course, I included the results of their check tool. No problem.
> >
> >> Did IBM refuse to replace your failing drives?
> >
> > no, but 5 out of 5 died and took tons of valuable data with them.
> >
> > That is the worst case scenario. All other harddrives had no problems at
> > all. Different mobos, PSUs - nothing changed the fact that all death
> > stars I ever owned died violently - except the last one, because I sold
> > the computer it was built in in time.
> >
> >> Did you include
> >> detailed technical information that should have allowed them to
> >> resolve issues leading to those drives' failures? For me, SAMSUNG's
> >> behavior in the customer service department indicated that I wasn't
> >> likely to get good service in the future, and the rapidly-failing
> >> drives (combined with my analysis of the SMART output and the history
> >> of SMART problems with SAMSUNG drives) indicated to me that I'd need
> >> to use that customer service department in the future if I bought more
> >> of their drives.
> >
> > there was one smart related problem with Samsung in the last year. With
> > their 2tb drives. Samsung released a firmware patch after they were
> > informed of the problem.
> >
> > Apart from that Samsung drives just work for me - and the people around
> > me.
> >
> > I also had no problems with drives getting replaced - but the replacing
> > was always the problem of my trusted hardware dealer. That is why you
> > buy hdds from a trusted, local guy. The rest was the problem of
> > Samsung. They can't wiggle out of Germany's warranty laws ;)
>
> Yeah, I bought mine from Newegg. Hard drive warranty through Newegg
> means "see manufacturer". I've had no problem with WD's customer
> service. Haven't had occasion to try anyone but SAMSUNG and WD.
>
> Problem with buying locally where I am is that it generally means a
> 50% markup above what I'd pay Newegg. There are several big-box stores
> in the area whose prices and selections aren't great. There are three
> small computer stores within a 45 minute drive, and their selection
> tends to be better, but their prices tend to be worse.
my 'local' shop has only 10% higher prices than cheap online sellers. Worst
case. Most of the time it is a lot less - and sometimes cheaper than online. I
am willing to pay that 'premium' for service and the knowledge that when I
tell them the drive is dead they don't even try to put the blame on me. Same
for Ram - or mainboards ;) After bad experience with Enermax - waiting 6 weeks
for a replacement for a PSU that killed three mobos and enermax being too
cheap to even put a new set of cables in the box I went with BeQuiet. 48h
replacement.
--
#163933
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-28 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-27 8:15 [gentoo-user] Hard drive RPMs and data speed Dale
2011-10-27 10:09 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-10-27 11:18 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-27 16:24 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-27 17:30 ` Dale
2011-10-27 17:51 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-27 18:41 ` Dale
2011-10-27 18:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-27 19:17 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-27 19:41 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-27 20:00 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-28 14:55 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-28 15:19 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-28 19:08 ` Volker Armin Hemmann [this message]
2011-10-31 16:21 ` Alex Schuster
2011-10-31 16:53 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-31 18:47 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-27 20:36 ` Bill Longman
2011-10-27 20:11 ` Paul Hartman
2011-10-27 18:49 ` Florian Philipp
2011-10-28 4:10 ` Dale
2011-10-28 11:15 ` Mark Knecht
2011-10-28 11:36 ` Dale
2011-10-28 13:40 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-28 14:18 ` Paul Hartman
2011-10-28 15:53 ` Mark Knecht
2011-10-28 19:11 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-28 20:49 ` Mark Knecht
2011-10-30 5:04 ` daid kahl
2011-10-31 9:49 ` [gentoo-user] " James Broadhead
2011-10-31 10:58 ` Dale
2011-10-31 14:42 ` James Broadhead
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2268258.3i3Eoas9dr@localhost \
--to=volkerarmin@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox