From: Michael <confabulate@kintzios.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: problem formatting new 256 GB USB stick : alternatives
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:25:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2240299.Icojqenx9y@rogueboard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vp2teb$99t$1@ciao.gmane.io>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2168 bytes --]
On Tuesday 18 February 2025 21:18:03 Greenwich Mean Time Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2025-02-18, Philip Webb <purslow@ca.inter.net> wrote:
> > 250218 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> >> I recommend an external USB case with an NVMe SSD inside.
> >> This may not be as compact and not as cheap,
> >> but they are much much much faster and probably longer-lasting
> >> than any USB stick, because their flash controllers are more
> >> sophisticated
> >> and the parts of higher fidelity. A not-too-cheap NVMe will do fine,
> >> as long as it’s TLC, not QLC flash.
> >
> > Can you explain this -- TLC/QLC -- in more detail ?
>
> Tri-Level Cells, Quad-Level Cells.
>
> SLC (single-level cells)
>
> Each "cell" consists of a capacitor (constructed as a FET with an
> isolated-gate). In the old days, the capacitor was either chared or
> not: two levels. One bit per cell. Easy to make and reliable. If
> you want more bits, layout more cells. That means larger dies, which
> means more money.
>
> MLC (two-level cells)
>
> OK, let's also do four different charge levels! You get _two_ bits
> per cell with the same area of silicon. Harder to do and not quite as
> reliable, so we'll add a few extra blocks of cells and make software
> deal with blocks that don't work.
>
> TLC (tri-level cells)
>
> Hey, what if we do 8 different charge levels! Now you get 4 bits per
> cell. Even harder to do, even less reliable...
>
>
> QLC (quad-level cells)
>
> [I think you see where this is going]
Yep, SLC > MLC > TLC > QLC in terms of performance, reliability, longevity and
price. The phenomenal decrease in price per GB/TB over time is just that.
Phenomenal. For reasons Grant explained it comes with measured reduction in
reliability and longevity. Since they come with fast(er) DRAM cache which to
some extent masks the underlying NAND performance, with other things being
equal it makes sense to choose one with faster/larger DRAM. I think most
consumer grade cards these days tend to be TLC and the cheaper ones QLC. QLC
ought to outlast a conventional USB stick, but given a choice I'd opt for TLC.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-15 7:41 [gentoo-user] problem formatting new 256 GB USB stick Philip Webb
2025-02-15 11:50 ` [gentoo-user] " Nuno Silva
2025-02-15 13:31 ` Michael
2025-02-16 2:37 ` Philip Webb
2025-02-16 9:08 ` Nuno Silva
2025-02-16 13:41 ` Michael
2025-02-16 14:48 ` Wols Lists
2025-02-17 23:12 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-02-18 11:53 ` Michael
2025-02-19 12:10 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-02-20 9:58 ` Michael
2025-02-16 22:57 ` [gentoo-user] problem formatting new 256 GB USB stick : more info Philip Webb
2025-02-17 0:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Nuno Silva
2025-02-17 0:39 ` [gentoo-user] " Michael
2025-02-17 3:43 ` Philip Webb
2025-02-17 9:18 ` Philip Webb
2025-02-17 12:02 ` Michael
2025-02-17 16:33 ` Stroller
2025-02-17 16:19 ` Wols Lists
2025-02-17 17:16 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2025-02-17 18:12 ` Michael
2025-02-18 3:46 ` [gentoo-user] Re: problem formatting new 256 GB USB stick : f3 Philip Webb
2025-02-18 4:43 ` Grant Edwards
2025-02-18 5:53 ` Philip Webb
2025-02-18 9:13 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-02-18 19:10 ` [gentoo-user] Re: problem formatting new 256 GB USB stick : alternatives Philip Webb
2025-02-18 21:18 ` Grant Edwards
2025-02-18 23:25 ` Michael [this message]
2025-02-19 12:16 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-02-19 12:20 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-02-20 10:47 ` Michael
2025-02-18 14:40 ` [gentoo-user] Re: problem formatting new 256 GB USB stick : f3 Grant Edwards
2025-02-18 17:00 ` Grant Edwards
2025-02-18 11:57 ` Michael
2025-02-18 18:54 ` [gentoo-user] Re: problem formatting new 256 GB USB stick : glances at gparted Philip Webb
2025-02-18 23:13 ` Michael
2025-02-19 0:47 ` Grant Edwards
2025-02-19 1:12 ` [gentoo-user] alternatives to USB sticks for reliable archiving Philip Webb
2025-02-19 2:28 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2025-02-19 9:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Michael
2025-02-19 3:00 ` [gentoo-user] Re: problem formatting new 256 GB USB stick : glances at gparted eric
2025-02-20 18:18 ` Dale
2025-02-20 22:40 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-02-20 23:43 ` Grant Edwards
2025-02-21 8:10 ` Dale
2025-03-08 22:09 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-03-08 22:48 ` Dale
2025-03-09 10:31 ` Michael
2025-03-10 3:32 ` Dale
2025-03-10 13:01 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-02-17 16:38 ` [gentoo-user] problem formatting new 256 GB USB stick Stroller
2025-02-17 23:06 ` Frank Steinmetzger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2240299.Icojqenx9y@rogueboard \
--to=confabulate@kintzios.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox