From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QYkiS-00066Y-Lu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:05:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E84BF1C13C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981F11C09B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e.earth.lavabit.com (e.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.14]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D4811BD9E for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:18:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from juno.localnet (1-1-4-36a.dre.sth.bostream.se [82.182.34.222]) by nerdshack.com with ESMTP id KKPSRWZ0DFGW for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:18:36 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=nerdshack.com; b=AE7iMtVjaHimJ9J+wyNUd3RwB+I4tkshaSxmPRF7bTUWgkEUeryME+MUP+u/57zaB8EBdzS0lwnh2RbJk0fntPu9B4FDArfuUkjkM6TQft9fwqtBrLz50NQqfIvgNTZKTH3mTb8b+uPNaMQpUg+WnGZ+OqS1VdwGkcavG9ggmqo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:User-Agent:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; From: Nils Larsson To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Use split to break up a 10GB file binary? Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:17:25 +0200 Message-ID: <2224741.WZr7aDAGnF@juno> User-Agent: KMail/4.6.0 (Linux/2.6.38.5-zen-sol; KDE/4.6.4; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e4e3b7d501d78d455c40ce242a3b74bc On Monday 20 June 2011 08:25:57 Mark Knecht wrote: > Hi, > Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file > into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then > use cat to reassemble? > > Is there some better way to do this? Maybe not better, but you could use a torrent application that support magnet links to send files across the net. No need to send chop it up in chunks then.