From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qt33m-0002vs-Jc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:42:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 891AE21C303; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D4021C21F for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxd23 with SMTP id 23so4751129fxd.40 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:41:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=6ANFrildlyqzWEIf08j4bIgbgthZzhGRc4/fDKl4KvY=; b=iFL3IL/YRHKCM95XYbM66QwyOcVx/nyr+UuqC6hZI3ZfAe3Y67JSuko6QwZf9P0Hw3 uF7vP6/kxJcEekBxuIn1sazYD0+I31BxYkKNYsrzRHwd4hBbzM1/7vwaet+wQoZ/Ye8p Hq482GbzaN9cJ+xBiGLDECQIebTLjKDE6+/tE= Received: by 10.223.51.19 with SMTP id b19mr5992227fag.34.1313437305612; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC7435C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.67.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j23sm1490701faa.22.2011.08.15.12.41.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:41:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage blockage gnome-control-center vs gnome-media Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:41:38 +0200 Message-ID: <2216570.LjA1CDCLJ9@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.0 (Linux/3.0.1; KDE/4.7.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1792195.D9ys82rHzO@nazgul> References: <13699215.GWIA95SEgq@localhost> <1792195.D9ys82rHzO@nazgul> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: bf3bcd7a7ad816e845c05a8ee390ceb4 Am Montag 15 August 2011, 20:04:21 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > On Mon 15 August 2011 19:31:50 Volker Armin Hemmann did opine thusly: > > Am Montag 15 August 2011, 19:25:12 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > > > On Mon 15 August 2011 11:33:02 Paul Hartman did opine thusly: > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Alan McKinnon > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > That caught me out a few times too. I put these commands > > > > > into a bash alias: > > > > > > > > > > emerge --sync > > > > > layman -S > > > > > eix-update > > > > > > > > > > and use that to sync portage. That way I don't leave > > > > > steps out.> > > > > > > > > > Congratulations, you reinvented the "eix-sync" command. :) > > > > > > You caught me out :-) > > > > > > There was a reason (a good one) why I did that several years > > > ago, but for the life of me I can't think what it was. > > > > if eix-sync fails with one of the overlays, all fails. > > if one overlay fails doing it step by step you can do all the other > > stuff without worrying about it. > > Sounds familiar, odds are good that's what drove me to take the long > road. > > I take it eix-sync still has this same behaviour? well, it failed on me a few weeks ago. -- #163933