From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B07F1382C5 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D38E52BC0A7; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A3382BC0A2 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.30.216.240] (helo=peak.localnet) by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1krPdI-00070g-Hw for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:10:08 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: WiFi on old Thinkpad Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:10:08 +0000 Message-ID: <2199850.ElGaqSPkdT@peak> In-Reply-To: References: <5687092.lOV4Wx5bFT@peak> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.30.216.240] Feedback-ID: 82.30.216.240 X-Archives-Salt: 22200b89-bc20-42e7-a83b-b79c0ee5bebd X-Archives-Hash: 9cba9c75107b3aa79879299785d7d482 On Monday, 21 December 2020 15:08:20 GMT Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2020-12-21, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > What does the team think is the best way to get WiFi going? Is > > wpa-supplicant a good idea? > > I've never used anything else. > > > That's what the handbook recommends, but I think I remember > > something like wicd being better. > > Better how? Easier to use, more flexible, less constrained by config settings, ... Something like that, but it was a long time ago. -- Regards, Peter.