From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-185081-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF2F138334
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue,  2 Oct 2018 08:25:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A212FE0B51;
	Tue,  2 Oct 2018 08:25:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35B93E0A87
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  2 Oct 2018 08:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet)
	by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>)
	id 1g7FzZ-0007nG-5V
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 08:25:17 +0000
From: Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is this a genlop bug?
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 09:25:16 +0100
Message-ID: <2199252.0uFp1bq9u2@peak>
In-Reply-To: <CAJjrzcUByWEHhLOmRHWqrQTtrsg3k1-Gy=vjQ8C-s=bgfqa0dg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6899100.3HpOLymiAI@peak> <045234B3-F9CA-4B65-975D-F9334720245A@gmail.com> <CAJjrzcUByWEHhLOmRHWqrQTtrsg3k1-Gy=vjQ8C-s=bgfqa0dg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.80.10]
Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10
X-Archives-Salt: 470b4e27-2e5f-4988-867e-bb707656b939
X-Archives-Hash: 8315a8cf58b268d235ba80948f230f3e

On Monday, 1 October 2018 13:22:42 BST Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 14:03, Andrew Udvare <audvare@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 2018-10-01, at 05:25, Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> > > This looks like a bug to me.
> > 
> > It is not a bug. The manpage says it takes name or category/name. In the
> > former case it has to match anything named rust. There are two packages
> > named exactly 'rust': dev-lang/rust and virtual/rust.
> The '-c' parameter doesn't (need to) take either name or category/name
> so I don't see how this isn't a bug. Getting an ETA average for more
> than one package and comparing it against the currently merging
> package makes no sense.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/667534 submitted.

-- 
Regards,
Peter.