From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HhpEk-0005F3-6y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:53:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3SFq7l9013378; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:52:07 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3SFjBpW003863 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:45:13 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F2264CB4 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:45:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.034 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.034 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.034] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PIn+BiwE0h1t for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030D164D91 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hhp6c-00027z-9p for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:45:02 +0200 Received: from 84-72-80-81.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.80.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:45:02 +0200 Received: from listen by 84-72-80-81.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:45:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Alexander Skwar Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Reducing disk usage Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:41:12 +0200 Organization: =?UTF-8?B?LsK3Lg==?= Message-ID: <2191349.3kJDPzykLF@m-id.message-center.info> References: <49bf44f10704260759g214dbb00o40c674ca7167cdd2@mail.gmail.com> <4630E536.3040108@fire-eyes.org> <1433284.sqkpgDReDL@m-id.message-center.info> <20070428095901.GA3742@ark.in-berlin.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 84-72-80-81.dclient.hispeed.ch User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l3SFq7lP013378 X-Archives-Salt: 17cb1658-abf7-40b7-ad82-8ac7f0039fed X-Archives-Hash: 67045e6fa26a945101d2ff4bd941418d =C2=B7 Ralf Stephan : >> This Depends largely on the "type" of files. I've got my portage >> tree on a reiserfs, and in comparison to ext3, it saves couple >> 100 (one-zero-zero) megs! >=20 > OTOH, you may not need to switch to reiser for that. Uhm, any particular reason, why switching to reiser just for that would be bad? I've got the tree on a filesystem which is dedicated for that. Alexander Skwar --=20 Moonchild without an opinion? Satan is skating to work tomorrow! -- Brett Manz --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list