From: Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it?
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:13:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2163425.EpC7bA8mPK@peak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A26A5D2.4050104@youngman.org.uk>
On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 13:57:38 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> I've just had a long thread with someone on the SUSE list who refuses to
> believe that the "twice ram" rule ever existed.
>
> This despite someone else actually describing the algorithm (from which
> one can see where the rule comes from), and me pointing out that (after
> Linus stripped out all the "awful" optimisation code) the early vanilla
> 2.4 kernels enforced this rule by crashing if you broke it.
>
> Swap was rewritten as a result of that, but I've never heard whether the
> fundamental algorithm was changed, so I still provision my systems on
> the assumption it's true. Disk is cheap ... my 4TB drives cost about
> £110, so that makes 128GB for swap cost, what, £3? I'll probably never
> need it, but hey, at that price :-)
Ah, but it's a different kettle of fish if you're using LVMe SSD! :)
Mine is 256GB and doesn't have an awful lot of spare capacity, what with
BOINC and being the compile host for two other boxes.
--
Regards,
Peter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-22 6:52 [gentoo-user] is multi-core really worth it? Raffaele Belardi
2017-11-22 7:21 ` R0b0t1
2017-11-22 7:26 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2017-11-22 8:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-11-22 8:34 ` David Haller
2017-11-22 10:07 ` [gentoo-user] " Martin Vaeth
2017-11-22 11:26 ` David Haller
2017-11-23 22:47 ` Martin Vaeth
2017-11-22 13:12 ` [gentoo-user] " Raffaele Belardi
2017-11-22 13:23 ` J. Roeleveld
2017-11-22 14:11 ` Tsukasa Mcp_Reznor
2017-11-22 14:34 ` Wols Lists
2017-11-22 16:27 ` J. Roeleveld
2017-12-05 4:11 ` Taiidan
2017-12-05 4:17 ` R0b0t1
2017-12-05 10:09 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-05 10:46 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-05 11:13 ` Raffaele Belardi
2017-12-05 11:39 ` Mick
2017-12-05 13:07 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-12-05 13:57 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-05 14:13 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
2017-12-05 21:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-12-06 13:29 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-06 15:34 ` Alan McKinnon
2017-12-06 16:07 ` Wols Lists
2017-12-06 23:51 ` [gentoo-user] " Ian Zimmerman
2017-12-06 16:12 ` [gentoo-user] " Wols Lists
2017-12-06 17:24 ` Kai Peter
2017-11-22 7:48 ` David Haller
2017-11-22 8:32 ` J. Roeleveld
2017-11-22 8:57 ` David Haller
2017-11-22 12:16 ` Peter Humphrey
2017-11-22 16:36 ` Neil Bothwick
2017-11-28 10:07 ` [gentoo-user] " Raffaele Belardi
2017-12-01 10:39 ` J. Roeleveld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2163425.EpC7bA8mPK@peak \
--to=peter@prh.myzen.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox