From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0C11381FA for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 09:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3630E0B76; Mon, 5 May 2014 09:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A82E0B57 for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 09:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet) by smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WhF1j-000Bh3-Vb for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 May 2014 10:17:36 +0100 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] More emerge oddity in chroot - SOLVED Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 10:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: <2152913.rDdV0d4Pxj@wstn> Organization: at home User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.12.13-gentoo; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1885167.aMnpauQx9V@andromeda> References: <5383625.3zvFPHoqv2@wstn> <4268110.1WI4jfuppv@wstn> <1885167.aMnpauQx9V@andromeda> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [82.69.80.10] X-Archives-Salt: 5def9fc0-5d43-4773-bb97-353d76c2ba61 X-Archives-Hash: 93c4693ddac63b1b1a5d9901afbe0882 On Sunday 04 May 2014 20:52:13 J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 01:47:08 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: > I thought the man-page for badblocks (it's a seperate utility) actually says > it should be run on the physical disks? Could well do so - I stopped reading when I came to this: "... it is strongly recommended that users not run badblocks directly, but rather use the -c option of the e2fsck and mke2fs programs." :-) > > On Monday 28 Apr 2014 13:32:05 I wrote: > > Perhaps I should find a different slot for the Quadro FX580 > > card, to separate it from the usb interface. > > Always a good idea, if possible. > USB and Video are both heavily used items. Yes, you're right. I'll see what I can arrange. It must be time to get the duster out too. Also, this morning I see this in dmesg: [66770.347672] nouveau E[ PFIFO][0000:01:00.0] DMA_PUSHER - ch 4 [kwin[6587]] get 0x002007524c put 0x0020075704 ib_get 0x00000068 ib_put 0x00000072 state 0x8000753c (err: INVALID_CMD) push 0x00406040 [66770.347697] nouveau E[ PFIFO][0000:01:00.0] DMA_PUSHER - ch 4 [kwin[6587]] get 0x002037c000 put 0x002037c054 ib_get 0x00000069 ib_put 0x00000073 state 0x80000000 (err: INVALID_CMD) push 0x00406040 > USB-mouse, keyboard,harddrive,flash-stick,.... ? > Eg. anything plugged into USB can cause interrupts. No USB mouse or keyboard here; still using PS/2. I usually have a memory stick plugged in but I removed it during the investigation. The external USB disk will have been powered up for some of the time. > Also, some mainboards have additional items pre-connected to the USB-bus. Time to stick my head into the nVidia docs... -- Regards Peter