From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F2F15801B for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 08:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01E62E08A0; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 08:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw.thundermail.uk (mail-gw.thundermail.uk [149.255.60.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4067BE0875 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 08:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailgw01.thundermail.uk (uwhmailrelay01.unlimited.uk.net [149.255.60.67]) by mail-gw.thundermail.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC3960000B6 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 09:41:17 +0100 (BST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1680943275-0554135cb3137cbe0001-LfjuLa Received: from mailclean01.thundermail.uk (mailclean01.thundermail.uk [149.255.60.66]) by mailgw01.thundermail.uk with ESMTP id tMgGPzP68CQTA9Y2 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 09:41:16 +0100 (BST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: confabulate@kintzios.com X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: mailclean01.thundermail.uk[149.255.60.66] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 149.255.60.66 Received: from cloud220.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk (cloud220.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk [149.255.60.183]) by mailclean01.thundermail.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08F5C404DA for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 09:41:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from lenovo.localdomain (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.3.230]) by cloud220.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5884ECE900D for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 09:41:10 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kintzios.com; s=default; t=1680943270; bh=U+fS6IuTZ0ygN/TQc096ZwLH76Y7+QkFQ9OZIaCM7n0=; h=From:To:Subject; b=tSEaapDw0JtEezhqWLDnHmUR7n6em7OIJOMKfHN2iqMhVGUy1swdM9uUTvRFFqy18 WbVvZPjCivmyH4lLaLvMTxQ+AR+u0f3uchIXC6c1ric4f77yuZpUBueqqRwR/iQPwb ajqPS5bR6bPHFPgQorzHh7otcb6pm9nRHbEthJzA= From: Michael To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openrc service crash Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 09:41:09 +0100 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [gentoo-user] Openrc service crash Message-ID: <2140559.irdbgypaU6@lenovo.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <2279290.ElGaqSPkdT@lenovo.localdomain> References: <2165033.irdbgypaU6@lenovo.localdomain> <4821126.31r3eYUQgx@lenovo.localdomain> <2279290.ElGaqSPkdT@lenovo.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-PPP-Message-ID: <168094327050.2799567.2163536909405824422@cloud220.unlimitedwebhosting.co.uk> X-PPP-Vhost: kintzios.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=11.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from * author's domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from * envelope-from domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mailclean01.unlimited.uk.net X-Barracuda-Connect: mailclean01.thundermail.uk[149.255.60.66] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1680943276 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 X-Barracuda-URL: https://149.255.60.67:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at thundermail.uk X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 1143 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.107138 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Archives-Salt: 110c6012-4773-4c86-b008-72a1a4d13c22 X-Archives-Hash: ae5dcfc56431501cea2addaec1c6b5f8 On Saturday, 8 April 2023 09:33:23 BST Michael wrote: > On Saturday, 8 April 2023 09:32:31 BST Michael wrote: > > On Saturday, 8 April 2023 09:28:16 BST Arve Barsnes wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 10:00, Michael wrote: > > > > It was probably the addition of IPv6 - as a workaround I added 'sleep > > > > 5s' > > > > before the gatling init.d exec command and it now starts normally. > > > > > > If it was indeed the network that was missing, you could try changing > > > the service from "need" to "after" starting the net service. > > > > > > Add to /etc/rc.conf: > > > rc_gatling_after="net" > > > > > > Regards, > > > Arve > > > > Thanks Arve, I will try it. Should this replace the "need net" string > > here, or added somewhere else? > > > > depend() { > > > > need net > > > > } > > Oops! Please ignore my question ... I didn't have enough coffee yet. :-) OK, I added rc_gatling_after="net" in rc.conf, but it didn't work. gatling crashed. However, adding 'sleep 5s' in its init.d startup script works. What might be causing this discrepancy?