From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJ4l1-000738-OS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:52:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k818nrr7006030; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:49:53 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k818kigu014955 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:46:45 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481A96480B for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06498-19 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC8B6480D for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GJ4fG-0007dK-LB for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:46:14 +0200 Received: from new.email-server.info ([213.133.109.44]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:46:14 +0200 Received: from listen by new.email-server.info with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:46:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Alexander Skwar Subject: [gentoo-user] Dash as /bin/sh? Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:45:44 +0200 Message-ID: <2102237.F9AAudgNz4@work.message-center.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: new.email-server.info User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: f1846da5-5c91-4e1a-b896-6112b6e743cf X-Archives-Hash: 56b1d8162b27e344296e1955f9552bbf Hi! The Ubuntu folks report on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh, that bootup and also ./configure runs are *WAY* faster if "dash" is used as /bin/sh instead of bash. Did anyone try this out on Gentoo? Are the boot scripts from Gentoo strictly POSIX compliant? Bye, Alexander Skwar -- Vini, vidi, Linux! -- Unknown source -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list