From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569951381F3 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B218E0B4B; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [5.9.116.23]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEB0E0B3F for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BDF0DC14EF for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:14:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (78-32-181-186.static.enta.net [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 935D9DC14E5 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:13:59 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:13:58 +0100 Message-ID: <2094799.2IPDqlmdT9@wstn> Organization: Retired software quality manager User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.10.7-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <522DD0A1.5010207@libertytrek.org> References: <522DD0A1.5010207@libertytrek.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-DSPAM-Result: Whitelisted X-DSPAM-Processed: Tue Sep 10 10:13:59 2013 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 522ee2d746961157519621 X-Archives-Salt: 04ea3f36-c3fd-4482-af05-55ee9828142a X-Archives-Hash: d5c6c8386f9d90eb3f5d01900d597b3a On Monday 09 Sep 2013 09:44:01 Tanstaafl wrote: > Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has > been stabilized (at least on amd64)... --->8 > Now to wait a few days to see if there is any breakage to report (not > worried about it really, though, since it has actually gotten a ton of > testing over the last year or two)... ...and the first time I use it it falls over! Portage was the only thing updated yesterday, so nothing else changed at the same time. # emerge --sync >>> Synchronization of repository 'gentoo' located in '/usr/portage'... >>> Starting rsync with rsync://192.168.2.2/gentoo-portage... >>> Checking server timestamp ... receiving incremental file list rsync: mkstemp "/var/tmp/.tmp8KJSYc.AHSsPH" failed: Permission denied (13) I checked it wasn't anything I'd set in make.conf by stripping out everything but the original few lines from system installation, so I'm sure I hadn't set any odd paths. So for the moment I've masked out =sys-apps/portage-2.2.1 and reverted to 2.1.12.2. Now I'm getting some odd USE flag conflicts, which I suppose won't be related; I'll work on sorting that out. I also tried syncing a 32-bit chroot Gentoo system and that worked fine. That system has always had: # grep portage /etc/portage/package.keywords