From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qa5nt-0000Af-Aw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:48:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91F781C147; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292011C147 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so2548216wyb.40 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:43:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=WMKBXdM3k5VZUQEZGwA55ailWr80Ls7OdcwMqRVGzUk=; b=v3n6TsCw0DRJNLBqqtbxr2pdYt1O6hb0huhTJ+uOQjLB1XhuAbnBKwZx2jz6kk2T1B 3606Fk7yP9SMj9Qk+m4V/oF4ojyQ8Bq4OONUFbOWvpy9shUIePJ6tYUoB1VByXAG3WB1 cVmxoIZMXVGu9DoKkRsKwbcTHuG3GGXLqkGUs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=C+24Z27Ch/rmnmgSR35ZqIpvR61jZhRMI32j93wfz331h82eSpqiTTYRxwo6/WHc6B 62bhPfV4woKCzCVSh8qs2OjlydAEwMyMVTW81pftCIom87g4IJS+fO9zQHS2s69k+xSJ oc3w3LHD21SvnstkzXd9b6faV4w1ctlulLm2Y= Received: by 10.227.162.129 with SMTP id v1mr3029227wbx.63.1308919410010; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (dustpuppy.is.co.za [196.14.169.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d19sm1982363wbh.59.2011.06.24.05.43.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:43:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Stroller Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:42:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20781033.9idzzLNC0q@nazgul> User-Agent: KMail/4.6.0 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <0694AAD4-23E8-4BB8-BDB1-D5BE6CB66B7C@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <20110624011411.495fb6e8@digimed.co.uk> <0694AAD4-23E8-4BB8-BDB1-D5BE6CB66B7C@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6b76dcc1538d4b2896437c960f466c78 On Friday 24 June 2011 12:56:48 Stroller did opine thusly: > On 24 June 2011, at 01:14, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:01:30 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > >> 1) what's the difference between "package.keywords" and > >> "package.accept_keywords"? > > > > The latter is the new name for the former. > > So I can just `mv /etc/portage/package.keywords > /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords` and nothing will break? > > Stroller. Yes. man 5 portage -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com