From: karl@aspodata.se
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Fun with mdadm (Software RAID)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:44:53 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241220174453.4E33285A435A@turkos.aspodata.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z2WNHabueBfFD0jj@MAC.fritz.box>
Alan Mackenzie:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 15:50:53 +0100, karl@aspodata.se wrote:
...
> Because I didn't know about it. I found out about it this morning, and
> immediately tested it by setting up an
> "md=126,/dev/nvme0n1p4,/dev/nvme1n1p4" on the kernel command line, using
> the rescue disk to make the "preferred minor"s wrong, and testing it.
> It worked!
>
> If I understand things correctly, with this mechanism one can have the
> kernel assemble the RAID arrays at boot up time with a modern metadata,
> but still without needing the initramfs. My arrays are still at
> metadata 0.90.
Please tell if you make booting with metadata 1.2 work.
I havn't tested that.
///
...
> > And... what is the need for dynamic minors now when dev_t is 32bits:
> Dynamic minors? I don't think I follow you, here.
If you partition the md device, the partitions will get a device with a
dynamic minor.
# mdadm -C /dev/md11 -n 1 -l 1 --force /dev/sdc2
# mdadm -C /dev/md10 -n 1 -l 1 -e 0 --force /dev/sdc1
... create partitions
# fdisk -l /dev/md10
...
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/md10p1 2048 22527 20480 10M 83 Linux
/dev/md10p2 22528 192383 169856 82.9M 83 Linux
# fdisk -l /dev/md11
...
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/md11p1 2048 206847 204800 100M 83 Linux
/dev/md11p2 206848 1757183 1550336 757M 83 Linux
# cat /sys/block/md10/md10p1/dev
259:0
# cat /sys/block/md10/md10p2/dev
259:1
# cat /sys/block/md11/md11p1/dev
259:2
# cat /sys/block/md11/md11p2/dev
259:3
$ grep -A2 '259 block' /Net/git/linux-stable/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt
259 block Block Extended Major
Used dynamically to hold additional partition minor
numbers and allow large numbers of partitions per device
So, to boot to a md device partition (as /) might be a hit and miss
unless you use some initramfs magic.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-20 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-20 10:47 [gentoo-user] Fun with mdadm (Software RAID) Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-20 14:50 ` karl
2024-12-20 15:28 ` Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-20 17:44 ` karl [this message]
2024-12-20 20:19 ` Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-20 20:38 ` Hoël Bézier
2024-12-20 20:53 ` Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-20 22:02 ` karl
2024-12-30 4:08 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2024-12-20 22:02 ` karl
2024-12-21 12:43 ` Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-21 16:36 ` Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-21 16:45 ` karl
2024-12-21 16:58 ` Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-22 13:08 ` Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-22 12:16 ` Wols Lists
2024-12-22 12:08 ` Wols Lists
2024-12-22 12:02 ` Wols Lists
2024-12-22 13:43 ` Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-22 15:29 ` Peter Humphrey
2024-12-22 16:53 ` Wols Lists
2024-12-22 20:05 ` Alan Mackenzie
2024-12-25 21:16 ` Steven Lembark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241220174453.4E33285A435A@turkos.aspodata.se \
--to=karl@aspodata.se \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox