From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720B6138CA3 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 04:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0257CE0876; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 04:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0200.smtp25.com (mail0200.smtp25.com [174.37.170.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFCF0E07D8 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 04:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t3P4A31O020241 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 00:10:03 -0400 From: covici@ccs.covici.com To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] serious problems trying to go to new abi_x86_32 support In-reply-to: References: <12441.1429904241@ccs.covici.com> <10896.1429908712@ccs.covici.com> <7152.1429913341@ccs.covici.com> Comments: In-reply-to Mike Gilbert message dated "Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:12:41 -0400." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.5; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <20237.1429935003.1@ccs.covici.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 00:10:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20238.1429935003@ccs.covici.com> X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110 X-SpamH-Filter: s-out-001.smtp25.com-t3P4A4k9029125 X-Archives-Salt: 721f18a4-a050-43bc-a28e-189e70aff629 X-Archives-Hash: 37c6f38debd17aff2fe9b597a200d384 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:09 PM, wrote: > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:51 PM, wrote: > >> > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote: > >> >> > Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so= I > >> >> > unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them= , > >> >> > because I am a coward), and then it was complaining that I shoul= d run > >> >> > emerge @preserved-rebuild which I did and every time I run that,= it > >> >> > gives me another package to change its use flag to add abi_x86_3= 2. > >> >> > After doing some 70 of those (a pain), I get to something which = I cannot > >> >> > solve. At some early point portage suggested that I run --newus= e > >> >> > --update when doing this, but now I am down to the following: > >> >> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy > >> >> > ">=3Dsys-apps/systemd-212-r5:0/2[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,a= bi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_= 32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]" > >> >> > have been masked. > >> >> > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete= your > >> >> > request: > >> >> > - sys-apps/systemd-9999::gentoo (masked by: package.mask, missin= g > >> >> > keyword) > >> >> > /etc/portage/package.mask: > >> >> > #need that system because of older kernel > >> >> > >> >> I'm confused. Are you saying that you have sys-apps/systemd in > >> >> /etc/portage/package.mask? > >> > ] > >> > I had to mask off later versions of systemd because I cannot use a > >> > kernel which is required by later versions of systemd. > >> > >> Later than what? What version of systemd do you have installed? > >> > >> There is probably no way to resolve the situation you are in if you > >> cannot rebuild systemd with the appropriate use flags. > > > > I am using 2.12-r5. I guess I need to restore the system to before = I > > started fooling with things. I tried to pub abi_x86_32 in the > > make.conf, but no joy. > > > = > If you really need to, you can grab the systemd-212-r5 ebuild and > patches from the CVS attic: > = > https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/system= d/systemd-212-r5.ebuild > https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/system= d/files/212-0001-sd-rtnl-fix-off-by-one.patch > https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/system= d/files/212-0002-fsck-Search-for-fsck.type-in-PATH.patch Well, now that I have put abi_x86_32 in make.conf and did those 80 packages and fixed the preserved_libs, in my next update it wants to do 199 reinstalls to get every possible package which has that flag -- do I need all that or should I go back to the individual packages, now that things are fixed as far as the libs are concerned? Do I gain anything by having all those packages have that flagg set? -- = Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com