From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9857158089 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C56542BC123; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (mail.digimed.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75F872BC10F for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.4]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B0B3A89A42 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:05:33 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:05:29 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] long compiles Message-ID: <20230911210529.48de20be@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/_ElJrwVlVH3WOWYuPQ=Z8pO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: 94ad8274-074d-4d08-9024-90d429197ddc X-Archives-Hash: 14e041f2644a4526f799c4b3c87d45f0 --Sig_/_ElJrwVlVH3WOWYuPQ=Z8pO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:19:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > chromium has been building since 10:14, it's now 21:16 and still going > so 9 hours at least on this machine to build a browser - almost as bad > as openoffice at it's worst (regularly took 12 hours). Nodejs also took > a while, but I didn't record time. Chromium is definitely the worst, and strangely variable. The last few compiles have taken between 6 and 14 hours. Since it takes longer than everything else to build, it is usually compiling on its own, so parallel emerges aren't a factor. Qtwebengine is also bad, not surprising as it is a cut down Chromium. Emerging world with --exclude then timing build to coincide with sleep helps, although I haven't quite reached the age where I need 14 hours of sleep a day. --=20 Neil Bothwick If it isn't broken, I can fix it. --Sig_/_ElJrwVlVH3WOWYuPQ=Z8pO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEGfLZTV7dXdQXh/dDdCdyyQfftocFAmT/cwkACgkQdCdyyQff tof5Fg//TRfkK4sMJodRAtruTnsXzU11vbj/67wfmbemUoA/SuwyCL1L3IghwE7w SIIx6OpT2tK2ly4sFIlcH5xGdf3x/T9d/Nd2vI3kTi9/VP1Vg7bdk0yurEj6lHBS izWGS0ufnSMxP9QRxuoAtlBBF0csuDXPFYPht2bCQ7EGFc620SVwZefyDqfnCkQh NgevzAyhJ1RCA03vygSHHzsK/it2A9n1MsfOv6PFqYAVQvOhLlA/Ip7O6U3pgFQa PmhcDRBv1mkG3fLNGEVbyJnjLTyNxeTUSmtwKi+CzXk3uHaCvZ9y3gdcgnvZ17YJ vw+9ncYl5NYNEh6EFfM1xluWAdbc9w8YCu9tY/dPa7mTTx29GitVFFWwdko/JG8H KFreBzBDRaAMrn+YlRklEbkTDSEed4SZxmFpKYDYCgdAr1GI2ZioWKY6qdrdqalq 5kBpDQ+NlPPXlATbzpTwXkFdsl2Qoyj9vinHNw0roqaiZUwRFSCnWcGnACAsGXA9 /nzuzwFFH2vZmooHT+L2vyHvp/UGiUVQNBH0ndAJIV1edNIhWuyewT2zHsYkLMba 37pt5IHuCzzhzv23nWZhi6rU1ACOjehuHe3ROZGcZKkNp0EKn+Ht3T78fKbq2Rdc 44zEC7Is+Kk7LzXFlRlQKss6f+gRBF7EKX5J7R2FZ6NS4FaXw8Q= =2RVC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_ElJrwVlVH3WOWYuPQ=Z8pO--