From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBDAF158091 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA328E097B; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (mail.digimed.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C503E0837 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B218F10B169 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:20:37 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:20:36 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Google pop3 authentication failure Message-ID: <20220614152036.5f7e58b4@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <25256.15923.327178.904124@tux.local> References: <25255.26817.453318.827974@tux.local> <20220613202046.0c9fe443@digimed.co.uk> <25256.15923.327178.904124@tux.local> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/5E=8I+NQ5CPwawebiPV/DdN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: 67b6f3d8-88a8-4aeb-95d7-1415c0874ce1 X-Archives-Hash: 80a8feb6b08e5c4e6b07eeb7e45e8cb5 --Sig_/5E=8I+NQ5CPwawebiPV/DdN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:52:19 +0200, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote: > > > Anybody knowing about a replacement for "fetchmail" which provides > > > daem- on mode as well as POP and OAuth support, and also allows > > > to directly feed the fetched mails into "procmail"? =20 > >=20 > > net-mail/getmail =20 >=20 > Do you know for sure? As mentioned in my original mail I was under the > impression that OAuth is only available together with IMAP but not with > POP3. See >=20 > https://getmail6.org/configuration.html#configuring Good point, it's that long since I set up getmail, I had to check if it was using IMAP or POP, and I'm using it with IMAP. Is there a reason you can't or won't use IMAP? --=20 Neil Bothwick Q: Why is top-posting evil? A: backwards read don't humans because --Sig_/5E=8I+NQ5CPwawebiPV/DdN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE8k9T/rX16EJxEKG692eFu0QSMJgFAmKomTQACgkQ92eFu0QS MJiU1w/+PXhBW1ValDsrAhfkDx7oLjd4pFF9fbAQ7pHNH+9byA8en7I8IQRHX99H RrXi3Ycx66hdO76MEiXBaBtI2A51hlg1oA/UVM5+3WcoickXiqdA9CPR1gGBU5Ck wttys/BIjU7cQac0IAzqvsXgT53O+SY1NQ0mTKNDEr8itchSXE1nqch/Q2DuhCKw rIz6As85TnHq9T3e/UvFIQVBDdmRuFcEhCCL2hDpL1oWaWXKl6Rp1HrIT4ar2F+q fJWylKO/JW3NVt6Hah9LFt3uqs9rZgs8j5nrtsc8+EiEAYNPzKnqkxw0BxGWF4bI rU1kT8LincwWhptr3rcGrOuScH9+Z7xwGCYWiw8L09YRiOxIFMMtVd1HMptEdDkn 10LflFj6lO6nDXO2G8P3I1O8TGxo2Kj3D7j4tEx7r/y9e0Z5H4yu1cGGBe2lIrLJ Rkeo8tLik8bRI/NEFOQoom4Wyow/V7Z0ldidLjJ2q6GO5uV1D5JA66CKYLjOwXNA KyoqtYnGJmeGdQoEoMtt+oIARqd65gQpmDFFFXZDhhBtcwjXlUlfUDA6kRXvK+TW sl+g0z9RQC9cPXQyGo6MBq04XrJH61OFNRLnt6/IteGfx3FqvesN3T6CLIfRuo8C mZqjULKDSBc8NbkB7msDaUd+sx4mXZ66twFBzxu2dTKBKv42/I8= =vbdE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5E=8I+NQ5CPwawebiPV/DdN--