From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096EF158086 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 22:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E5F32BC01C; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 22:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mta2.recol.net (mta2.recol.net [64.207.103.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF640E0814 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 22:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wrkhors.com (c-73-154-246-108.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.154.246.108]) by mta2.recol.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 092103996BD; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:31:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:31:09 -0500 From: Steven Lembark To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: lembark@wrkhors.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Apparently 2.4 is not >= 2.2? Message-ID: <20211222173109.798e7fe2.lembark@wrkhors.com> In-Reply-To: <2ab229ff-068e-97f7-36d6-ce71f8099f08@users.sourceforge.net> References: <20211221192837.4f826188.lembark@wrkhors.com> <2ab229ff-068e-97f7-36d6-ce71f8099f08@users.sourceforge.net> Organization: Workhorse Computing X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Workhorse: Quite Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 2752e852-4a41-49ba-9364-17d2687ae5a8 X-Archives-Hash: cf6c9432637ccf710b7e26d7c564cd69 On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:21:17 -0500 Jack wrote: > I may well be wront, but it looks like the problems are not due to=20 > version, but to python-target mismatches.=C2=A0 You may need to rebuild > some stuff first, such as pytest-runner and mako. You are probably right: I've spent more time playing with=20 PYTHON*TARGET variables and succesive rebuilds on this machine than actually doing any work for about a year. Annoyance is=20 that I don't do anything else with Python here so it's only=20 for the package manager.=20 This is for a fresh build from a recent stage3. It shouldn't=20 be this painful to just start a new system. --=20 Steven Lembark Workhorse Computing lembark@wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508