From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C168158041 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 19:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E76EE08FC; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 19:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (mail.digimed.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C7EE0896 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 19:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A2720684F9 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:14:03 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 20:13:57 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Broken update Message-ID: <20210907201357.488a3674@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <9db181b1-d91d-ac28-3d28-400570975677@gmail.com> References: <9db181b1-d91d-ac28-3d28-400570975677@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/T_=Y+nq=/bma7bDQdLq8MZI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: 14af73a0-ae67-4ccc-8e1d-ca18cbe0546c X-Archives-Hash: 389fe0e8c146ad3eb157f89d7189723f --Sig_/T_=Y+nq=/bma7bDQdLq8MZI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:32:41 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote: > Why is it checking the build environment for a binary package? I was wondering the same. > As it stands, I can't fix this problem. >=20 > I tried editing the ebuild (removing the __thread check) and rebuilding=20 > the manifest but it still fails at the same place. I've double- and=20 > triple-checked it's the right ebuild but it's still running the checks! >=20 > Some assistance on installing glibc would be much appreciated! You can untar the binary package into /, which bypasses the checks. Then you can emerge it so that portage knows where it stands. The usual guarantees apply: if it breaks your system, you get to keep the pieces. I'd backup / first. --=20 Neil Bothwick *Libra*: /(Sept 23--Oct 23)/ An unfortunate typo on your application results in your being accepted into the Legion Of Superherpes. --Sig_/T_=Y+nq=/bma7bDQdLq8MZI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE8k9T/rX16EJxEKG692eFu0QSMJgFAmE3ufUACgkQ92eFu0QS MJh4Dw//Wutv7DVjjelBa7Y9YQZsMjZmyMHy1uSvlSL6G4GQEmfDfqwd5KfYUk5p InePY19bVE7pwkrOy08ez7hagq5U2NZZMMVqZoAQ72Tp42zfWi1y8Xb6ZQzBI0iJ U81M0vsBRWSrtIWQ3LuLq54HAp7ZEWAn5wueAJPXC/BSJt/f1IIGeuW6TgAg46up 16hOF4MVki1SQP0Qm5ygIm1DHz069FVfUTLjLFThDg+vOU4sB6J//43pQAjveRvh Wfr7xi+XMVzrwiX2pU0Qo/FRUZOlGUvKlswumyHnuywVICx8Ft4CC2XbIjcJlqEM RuwM+jDCiX3YF7gWYOQYH9MsSuWQKyz16/WS+SA2HVfL9hEBVdJEGLPlO98yzi7J 5Yh60st4mncjKahnLCXDg+JvZMxDTd3AK9CwXgJR3v2+2hJQFygWrLW7mPbZSOAJ ZXdTFwVIIKGveZw/qIRzMgxxZcnl9bCItFgV//UtTnPSFdKbp8VPnALnPWvMF7To dh75ApzRlOACzXOc3MueyuTTuiwcy+ILSdJqVazvGMo7VF85E7/+hp4lEUpA9FYk edXfykvqBsyGxlhSELJzTfaD8bt5Z557GyhK0LiS9GiysXVo9qlPp3YcANiFccvG OzWf379OmkY2i7CiWK9Cti0orQL9YSIuoMs82DbL08EFDm5SgJU= =kzWG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/T_=Y+nq=/bma7bDQdLq8MZI--