From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A7A138359 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 02:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31B53E086F; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 02:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.suugaku.co.uk (unknown [IPv6:2a02:c7d:25f3:2800:c68:8688:e93c:2aa2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9EEBE0828 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 02:53:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=suugaku.co.uk; s=mail; t=1595559350; bh=BMXQTXrVTdjm/Fc6GRcq2M9B8Y4llr+bATCrU30ampY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=T5CwnTbgE2HCC6p+SJ7IvIKpPt9IeDKrVCgjZA0RacI75t50tYOV3jRl5Az9Q1I3+ YS5N0/JikTCY57X6YGHu2qTJSivdGYnHPAdUqqzNAHtMKS1ZguJ96blLBLOYORBbse QA0EVbuskjgh2Mbi3+bYY6X+cnKZf0GFaCkkJXqw= Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 03:52:05 +0100 From: Ashley Dixon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Strange output when restarting network. Long term issue. Message-ID: <20200724025205.ojsubvtv3f4qyddr@ad-gentoo-main> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <0efa1b11-c12c-3554-1f64-18a16f8492f2@gmail.com> <20200723044632.6lnlp4whk4xoul5u@ad-gentoo-main> <23caabaf-ae7e-4d3e-a24b-d7cdfbb9d94b@gmail.com> <20200724015910.74fvjhet5c5xul4h@ad-gentoo-main> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="um2u3vfnwo2jwon2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200724015910.74fvjhet5c5xul4h@ad-gentoo-main> X-PGP-Key: fp="2A9A DA96 8A7B A30E F290 4117 D18A B0D2 BF25 A8AA"; id="0xBF25A8AA"; get=; get= X-Operating-System: Linux ad-gentoo-main 5.4.48-gentoo X-Editor: vim 8.2 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Archives-Salt: d314bb85-149e-4ad0-9c14-4cea53020e78 X-Archives-Hash: 1ceb4cfbda900818d38edbfd43092e35 --um2u3vfnwo2jwon2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:59:10AM +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote: > I've just run it again, and it seems like the culprit is in the _show_add= ress > function, which calls einfo [1], passing the result of _get_inet_address.= I'll > have a look at this more now, as it's something I also would like to be > resolved. It seems like this is not the case. This might be a bug in netifrc, or the OpenRC init system helper functions in general. I can't find anything on-li= ne regarding this issue, although I'm sure it's reasonably common. --=20 Ashley Dixon suugaku.co.uk 2A9A 4117 DA96 D18A 8A7B B0D2 A30E BF25 F290 A8AA --um2u3vfnwo2jwon2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEKpralop7ow7ykEEX0Yqw0r8lqKoFAl8aTNQACgkQ0Yqw0r8l qKrszxAAiy2I1M14NbIQXewSow9vBdfeECraqJWyuibW3Uz5gVAdSlc8V1kNigZN AZVr7zspc0J77ouY/Th6ueUskHiYrL5D3fhpZHSmEpOMmrUFtTrs6YNMACAvQAPu NF3DtGKvKFs0taVQ2KU5/ocZLPKKTsdiC+UzNQEzA5UMcNZ2tnVLkNyLQJ7IkTOe 5R+HQ7ezfbMB+bFSF6Skra08VcuI6Ds2B50abInsi70j1lqMPjlZrU7rwCk/UlZT d2mpl+UBEk2MkweJGy6j3CPkRyOrSzPmAlp+Onq5vC9SYzYBMOWx3EeeTHwqwTwK /AIC+Ynb8BbOxEK+aii6jiN9zGQS/eb2gS2A0rFrSR6xxVvSn0qrhvw1UJCkwp+t UnbHJYUzEUjXR5Hi5Ba46Q2Pa6wHNZbQFMga+O8D1Xa6hgYzUFXmp0qVjK624jxA b0FfNjWKR5gKCK0fv6rUtlGNml/ihuy42oPurvLdo0oTyi0ZODGHCRU7gbd9B6JU tOUYNa7YgXuwaxcthKm5++MdrdvgLFuqi8FDVmAad0vJsxIj5m4bjt6GEfrV4atW IqBNpKryR/9uYbxe8+SLLI2Jt+DGe8XPuAjbJkmj93DsUXKp6SAIB0JTrDcku9mB +hCHjep+C8uXfCBwSMTs0GoDLHNWTiW31wB45kPzQrSkf37fQyc= =y8HC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --um2u3vfnwo2jwon2--