From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CDB81382C5 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA069E0898; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (mail.digimed.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3BCCE084A for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4BD1068F73 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:49:44 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:49:39 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: Do not update your system on ~amd64 Message-ID: <20200619114939.3fc74321@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <11546064.O9o76ZdvQC@peak> References: <1N9cHX-1iqyZS0VpV-015TL9@smtp.web.de> <0MOzwh-1jrEsA1EBz-006LGd@smtp.web.de> <20200617103854.600cc6ee@digimed.co.uk> <11546064.O9o76ZdvQC@peak> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/moIyNmygCY/VsY6agoltt6s"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: 0633b522-cf41-467e-89bd-4a680c2b0fa5 X-Archives-Hash: 51155728451916b5f5be519c4b5f4963 --Sig_/moIyNmygCY/VsY6agoltt6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:55:46 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > And today, pam and pambase are restored to their earlier versions > because sddm requires them. But sddm has not changed versions, so why > did portage want to upgrade pam and pambase on Wednesday? The sddm ebuild has changed without changing the version - pam? ( sys-libs/pam ) + pam? ( <=3Dsys-libs/pam-1.3.1_p20200128-r1 ) --=20 Neil Bothwick I used to live in the real world, but I got evicted. --Sig_/moIyNmygCY/VsY6agoltt6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE8k9T/rX16EJxEKG692eFu0QSMJgFAl7smEMACgkQ92eFu0QS MJhNaQ/7BBeIZeuIgMmRC2S5RqtKY7C1XXWZ70jSb1BeLJu+SCqyzzYU++HQ0ycc qsaJUf6g5q+Ld0wkS0iPqaZPt5Rv/Zy4jAaKIz9Q35aPf0azz/AwTeoWc4xhseEO ZAy0pwPAykKl6u3HZhdv/Fiz8n4x+Oo8c6LgGGS3biR5rmZH36qmVZAEiz62+G2x mMs9CWyaguHr6blLO5jW/HTbq7kwXPDiANS1Ka8ekgCukB+e7PMjdQOBF+v/xEXl /956vchLk+1nB82Nar/Ybpp+TFj2ZLAZcVuokYooI3zGR3C7s5bILdzlxjqoEZm9 FCTxHYItdaLczolOMfWSXNaDazxlIaR9m0MfgamUudWF3XtpvQT95h0CXxGSF7v7 lpfJbhnMB7uVG5Go+G+h/80ajV/VPkmFKWKHGWEf7MJz0hsg98ys13QG8Ch1X8Zi BmL5AnnSlPIwc9B1krGdY576e5MNg6WtnCuTXuahTbTLP7ex8eQYlNd1R/6diR1M kmqNiiDkC/tsnD06AOYll4+bqz+bSQXqUs0NngNAJfMU8XclTNWWNjrCOj/AnKVh pCKKTkz9LF09upXggW/Smpq0ibf69gjycvBupY+iHZGAt8TSrYbzv/mRQczVvNHJ 3nER2FJ9a1xIOJlpqwiSJudY9fYu02/6LHKyHcuQDVaB21ALeoo= =AXQf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/moIyNmygCY/VsY6agoltt6s--