From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08599138350 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 606A8E09C2; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1077BE09B8 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:31:57 +1200 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? Message-ID: <20200427233157.15cc9be0@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200422161455.GA23147@legohost> References: <20200421165803.GB187193@redacted> <11506562.O9o76ZdvQC@peak> <20200421190145.GF187193@redacted> <20200422161455.GA23147@legohost> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/q6CvbU_znJi8GDZA77AZO_g"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: 96e293c7-51dc-4e9b-be7a-bda47f505672 X-Archives-Hash: 93e9b367f26ea02b6ca96cdb972bf343 --Sig_/q6CvbU_znJi8GDZA77AZO_g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:14:55 +0300 lego12239@yandex.ru wrote: > portage must be in C and statically linked. Do you want Segfaults? Because that's how you get segfaults :p. Maybe Rust or something like it, but I don't really trust our capacity to implement something this complicated in C. --Sig_/q6CvbU_znJi8GDZA77AZO_g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEgdrME8Lrmai3DXYJda6SGagVg7UFAl6mwq8ACgkQda6SGagV g7XnLg//QTazxTpGXayknsuv0nA/yM8snmXAXJy1OARLM82JamIuXmjDFh6u3NiG KZ6RjWxruQFFEJMVX5kcXxt4+NyJxWwAP1ahTjANi1iUj8DC3+yoorLSRgYV+hwD GO//0hfe7Pkwmv/C9WCSc3csFHoIiCMvujq5aPr0zLXuB8QDnPKOAyJj6PZil+Np hw6JJvH0NgbPzxrp+gNxk1m+xxHgVA8n7WLtZTpllQF4j6y5squSRvm3yzv5aJvZ wpvdLpGyQqvK4+0ZiWp3/zP/F5XgRGQ5BbcfH4zDlm4ESbqdQAl+Qfycz3n8xSTf vbWb/BUBNzmQMPAd90y6ewmfqnuu5yX2RnyGbcAxRD2xO2nsG3Quz5F15wjLcaac gzRnAX6IPyJehDVSsqP9LGOCR8PEHoIYwiIuk9/pkwx+DFjGIyaaHP9zbnQgi816 dzmPax0FyF96LfrmTGuRUgBqp9ND9Jp7fpD3xO6v8zmB4f5oEv/ckm/1WMxziQVm /4N/jH+ijl1u+kQ62T7RkF5AszYzqLZCo9TGyqk7RNVkskxZd2iZj6Hu2DYW8IwO 5zLricfTwxHGX1ExKIv2pKUyh6WuM49TthDgFO5cLH6C0llA4muv5FATPoAOZeAx GqZArExbtuTag4iDdrfaLo4Q6yPTVLcmtugqyXqpYRB5p0+OojM= =PTKv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/q6CvbU_znJi8GDZA77AZO_g--