From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CABC6138350 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 757BCE0C9E; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.suugaku.co.uk (unknown [90.193.124.236]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D9AE0C86 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:23:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=suugaku.co.uk; s=mail; t=1587752694; bh=nfwlh1t04jfbVkUdmFFKj7UkDS/I7ruTLwWAI4uIdVg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=JLQfQQTOI8ySTXWDCAXfbhs1tTZBIiUCs26BRHLWG3/t/K8coIyoDxr6SLDoI1Qq1 BgUpi2Dvl+IS4WezAiP6iTNMBZ5MIKx8YotjFmGKkz+oX4D/aX69DCYsRRaRhYmCMo egWwdxb3L3mz6x62xFht8VwnxSEpUzjSx5NM7ivQ= Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:23:27 +0100 From: Ashley Dixon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? Message-ID: <20200424172327.zqry6znpx5fqy5ta@ad-gentoo-main> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <11506562.O9o76ZdvQC@peak> <20200421190145.GF187193@redacted> <20200422161455.GA23147@legohost> <20200423152716.51799a42.lembark@wrkhors.com> <20200424092239.GA16833@legohost> <20200424163027.ECFCF26B0F@disroot.org> <20200424180831.GB16597@legohost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5rdhlkfgsw2ius7r" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200424180831.GB16597@legohost> X-Operating-System: Linux ad-gentoo-main 5.4.28-gentoo User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Archives-Salt: 6d94899c-b346-4e3b-800b-229b770fe5a1 X-Archives-Hash: f8ba1da2e90032e42c1a0f1b121e8c19 --5rdhlkfgsw2ius7r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:08:31PM +0300, lego12239@yandex.ru wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 06:30:25PM +0200, inasprecali wrote: > > There is no rational reason for the core of Portage to be written in > > C. >=20 > There are more than one rational reasons to do so. Such as ? Portage builds complex models in memory, so an object-oriented language wou= ld be the obvious choice: should that be C++ or some other O.O.\ lang= uage. Regardless, this should probably become a new topic on another = list. gentoo-user seems inappropriate for this discussion, especially when= the collaborators aren't even bothering to remove the [OBORONA-SPAM] tags from= the subject line before sending (at the expense of the cleanliness of eve= ryone else's inbox). --=20 Ashley Dixon suugaku.co.uk 2A9A 4117 DA96 D18A 8A7B B0D2 A30E BF25 F290 A8AA --5rdhlkfgsw2ius7r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEKpralop7ow7ykEEX0Yqw0r8lqKoFAl6jII8ACgkQ0Yqw0r8l qKor/BAAqidTiaGLdrJMidq7Iq14pO2WkeJd6vph02jh+HzuBxn6DhiCaFlapToH YSMwhzMQ8chDgpzVHNz9rcUfzemPWxMb9FrSmB9AzzEcWH+1AincLYPuBnVyWkpu Zf5gaEELwl9bSI6hTxyrazaCrzDxpjwx//mfKUCJvLfpG77T1QG6IGiMpHu23qkO ctXYoE9aOVNJiiPVkJ5WyrLFw8W8jI6EGKPnuhqs3tCsyUD0E8widBDccoSzsko9 geVNxm2e0ecCL8FehZjROCLWVvrJnldYQO4a1F23lUkIn66D41EJ2eIZcvVhT/R/ cuFo4EOUMtnJy8uG3CMhmFURrgrKfLqRruzXLg/bvHS449ad9f6Ta1PW0hDrKS9d 8ENJA6cLFrD4jDbY6Ja+2doIQP1rA/2E5EhthxeXivWKxsL4UhbQL1cUsORtkkrI uYxZgr9oM1VVv98A7UwMrDhjjpxByo/r2rlqgbDvKBxEuvBxFL+L8G4RymTh4GC8 qNp+6D2oszP+aBDiMAVlwtOYpNpvPWv7B6qF1XRTB1E2CPX0PGTytbvsZmA0dfsN 48eDrbhvg7Pshdr4qMPttJU8xQ5OM2JDjUpy+/wYYDgxXWi/bm8oTtxfW5BRedA7 bnTJB9K/11dcfD2umPHJ/ZtFlplOJ8F/qydMjPFusDdHOqDmdNU= =p//4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5rdhlkfgsw2ius7r--