From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52392138350 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24A39E0BAA; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward106j.mail.yandex.net (forward106j.mail.yandex.net [5.45.198.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E62DE0B37 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxback24j.mail.yandex.net (mxback24j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::224]) by forward106j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DC23911A1C10 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:44:38 +0300 (MSK) Received: from myt6-efff10c3476a.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt6-efff10c3476a.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c12:13a3:0:640:efff:10c3]) by mxback24j.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id dYqvbVemju-icBmFptR; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:44:38 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1587631478; bh=xffzNkxfjJYLb0xblBT+Fd/88slPJ7DF/wbqzumrV7U=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:References:Date:Message-ID; b=rCq+Qrv4ekZAyfx4pOu2OcuQUfM1vbgKKQcPNJIcNIL3bUTPU1LUc16hxl0VoX0BL n59hoT8fSAEZQfmwdts2fXrzj1QJfeOFc6yND9zbWCeWZKdLXb/XH+Z8Ei4XI+TWwC 0aA5IjyTyJcLBNuMfEigDwwysds0VWCRathEv9R4= Authentication-Results: mxback24j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Received: by myt6-efff10c3476a.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id IRAL6LpLMW-icWCxR6p; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:44:38 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:45:46 +0300 From: lego12239@yandex.ru To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? Message-ID: <20200423084546.GD16612@legohost> References: <20200422162629.GA4639@legohost> <20200422180825.GA12885@legohost> <82271c88-bd0f-aa50-8155-e7028305e0ef@gentoo.org> <1ed023fa-1785-5951-127e-c8efc2895330@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1ed023fa-1785-5951-127e-c8efc2895330@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Archives-Salt: b4c80e87-46d1-4ec9-bc2b-0bb1e8ea6c64 X-Archives-Hash: b57d2f14d0fd65ca0a76b6438f706062 On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 03:24:07PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > FWIW, I do know there are situations where static linking is the right > thing to do. If you project require strong security, than it would be simpler to use static linking. If you have many instances of the same program or have many shortlived processes of the same program, than static linking is better(for ram and speed). Michael, just read about history of shared object. That was not technical decision, that was marketing decision. -- Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov)