From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8076F138350 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76287E0EE0; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward100o.mail.yandex.net (forward100o.mail.yandex.net [37.140.190.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CA14E0A44 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxback30j.mail.yandex.net (mxback30j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::230]) by forward100o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 292774AC0D1C for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:13:48 +0300 (MSK) Received: from sas2-b157fac3b6f2.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas2-b157fac3b6f2.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c08:b282:0:640:b157:fac3]) by mxback30j.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id o5Pq9hqt50-DlVCkxZt; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:13:48 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1587572028; bh=XJiI8DG6AYSDKstxTHZZ5t9voC/qZwuQszh+dEo3J6o=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:References:Date:Message-ID; b=M+tZMmgKZ/xB8kHuujGI7YjWSHX95IYlND6z+ogDw3mCd11dTCEzKLigOW8cbVO+w DicnYUFMQEB2s2aZ+3WFVGLPCfGAbmUvBkAIF+u49JNOMLttkMIlMQj4ZIQ4ZpI0EZ r62mhOiayKXha/GgTp1EVyNed3kT/8VH2wBwoD8M= Authentication-Results: mxback30j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Received: by sas2-b157fac3b6f2.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id CatY8yAwVR-DlXSI4fE; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:13:47 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:14:55 +0300 From: lego12239@yandex.ru To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? Message-ID: <20200422161455.GA23147@legohost> References: <20200421165803.GB187193@redacted> <11506562.O9o76ZdvQC@peak> <20200421190145.GF187193@redacted> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Archives-Salt: d9d35040-b168-4c5b-b503-e5d92794d85e X-Archives-Hash: 7fbeccd93fe9e20b75cdfef7538bc9d9 On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:07:52PM +0000, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote: > in fact, i think portage sucks so much it must be > rewritten from scratch, in such a way that it has > least run-time dependencies, so we stop worrying > about upgrading other packages, such as python. Yes. And yes again :-). +1 portage must be in C and statically linked. python is a strange dependency. -- Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov)