From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAB0B138350 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F2C8E0B78; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (cpc89902-warr7-2-0-cust45.1-1.cable.virginm.net [81.108.251.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8443CE0B61 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ECA39687B3 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:53:03 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 13:52:52 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ...recreating exactly the same applications on a new harddisc? Message-ID: <20200405135252.2aa7401d@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20200405092850.2mntgj3xbh3u53dt@ad-gentoo-main.Home> References: <20200404173459.eggbc2sijcnkw67j@solfire> <8b767f42-0945-ecd7-fcff-5fc0277841fd@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <20200405081741.o32ew747jluxa3qg@solfire> <20200405092850.2mntgj3xbh3u53dt@ad-gentoo-main.Home> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/eeDfjh9cDJLWQ_bxnDdDt2C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Archives-Salt: eb90a6b1-d4b5-4e4d-b4e7-b7bbb472e3b0 X-Archives-Hash: 97227ee63340fb9975cc0f7ed451e948 --Sig_/eeDfjh9cDJLWQ_bxnDdDt2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 10:28:50 +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote: > > Here /boot changes from fat32 to ext2.=20 > > Since this is my first U/EFI system I am a little confused. =20 >=20 > Good morning Meino, >=20 > For U.E.F.I., the boot partition (/dev/sda2) must be FAT32. In your > fstab file, this is written as (the last three arguments may vary for > your system): >=20 > /dev/sda2 /boot vfat defaults,noatime 0 2 > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Full/Installation#Using_UEFI This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still have an ext? /boot. However, it generally makes sense to have the ESP and /boot as the same partition, that's how I generally do it. either way, the handbook appears to need updating in this respect. --=20 Neil Bothwick Don't just do something, sit there! --Sig_/eeDfjh9cDJLWQ_bxnDdDt2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE8k9T/rX16EJxEKG692eFu0QSMJgFAl6J1KUACgkQ92eFu0QS MJgKgw//dAamKoS5L6rxmQvfJtJp1qdZv394tAza3Wj//XrO28BvMe54HGUp766K DYx0NRVIFUIKz7O+G4MnoFGrLhO/lsR0Ie/wB07otczH31QNrJg1CeyEkoD3hMM8 +Lci2dim+dIophQXQ1Fm2juXkYgB3KpV7Bq7JaXKtU8u/GaAh2a4u0b/urNKAKOC DsxM5DHWDS5pUM+egTuAqImwDD7vYVSzt62xPp0dpAYAwBy1d82IMYGHsW/hznqO dOwWYa9tLs5/eUzPGB8YjQ1pn6qcxVvM8JgU0S6bf1Gu5NA2FeMXD1VqtPUtw5Ug YKcslDYbKhLr6mPZBiFXFEzgmAjt8aLJbwS5V+F3R9DK1yDZv+akpkTant9MO3eH ym/OB3vBPDr5isGuwuY3zdb2TwR/DA5TKVhM6dRR6KZp0RfO1SDERQ68PnjLWtf/ 1sm9uXYTmRXCoPb4e1mqf4C54ry5purU7dTYTnuVZNPLgaNmgLaLPV/+MZDm/OX/ +RXRv8U3KLRK4K62/hHGWaJgui3qSUaYnFjdke/iGUXwtIBjUw9ydJuc/uSyVdfn GrJUizjzfS0vGmoSfdj2Vqvg8+jMt8lO3lZGzIBgUpFdofidGchtFBhv0a2VEsEz KalHjg46qKDsNYNHHCTxx+xCNx6d8nUDiNHTNiaUHSe/dxPznKU= =Zrp2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/eeDfjh9cDJLWQ_bxnDdDt2C--