From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DBA1138334 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18D07E092A; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from very.loosely.org (very.loosely.org [173.255.215.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC764E0919 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-67-174-233-217.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.174.233.217]:51902 helo=foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3-194-4d662e69c) (envelope-from ) id 1iX7gm-0008Hg-7O; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:53:20 -0800 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:53:10 -0800 From: Ian Zimmerman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: problem with named restarting Message-ID: <20191119175310.7ip2jcdstgogznjl@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20190917161414.fz24gizh7o2umqus@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20190917223351.wgdcfozsht5oqayc@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20190918154737.r2me37c4f7h4iads@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20190919164339.ixrblnwdkm2csans@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20191116211253.3g56ljnti5lzh57c@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Loosely-ASN: 7922 X-Archives-Salt: b15eb790-b3fd-4cdb-85d9-a9dd3c1e3c45 X-Archives-Hash: f4631740bace1b876f4e637a8296b0f0 On 2019-11-19 03:32, John Covici wrote: > > So, I made sure glibc had -gdb and recompiled and recompiled named, > but still no symbols. It was an assertion that failed, maybe this is > the reason. I can send you the core dump if you would be interested. First I'll look into the backtraces are generated. AFAIK a core dump only helps when one has the binary. I'll be back! -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.