From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51DB7138334 for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 17:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6754DE08A8; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 17:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02001E088A for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 17:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost03b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1htxgL-0002x8-Ka for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 17:19:01 +0000 Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 36C1264D64 for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2019 18:19:01 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 18:18:56 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Recent changes to install procedure Message-ID: <20190803181856.6ca066b9@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20190803171047.dltrydx5b7omwfba@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20190803042451.GA2824@waltdnes.org> <20190803075611.50bbbd1a@digimed.co.uk> <20190803162741.4mbhjih43uy3l36f@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <6b63a3dc-8c1a-1676-472d-cf1d65590fdd@gmail.com> <20190803171047.dltrydx5b7omwfba@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/w0c/BzqVTYOCEszw1tBypyc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Originating-smarthost03b-IP: [82.69.83.178] Feedback-ID: 82.69.83.178 X-Archives-Salt: 88cbb908-f7de-45d4-8fe6-437d61426665 X-Archives-Hash: 5426e6be17f694bd7281adb8e3d08172 --Sig_/w0c/BzqVTYOCEszw1tBypyc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 10:10:47 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > Do you know what tools those were? =20 >=20 > Sorry, I don't remember. I'll be sure to post here if I encounter the > same kind of problem. I've not had any problems wither, but at least one program complains if /etc/portage/make.conf is a directory, despite that being declared valid in the docs. --=20 Neil Bothwick "You want us to do WHAT?" - Ancient Chinese wall engineer. --Sig_/w0c/BzqVTYOCEszw1tBypyc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEGfLZTV7dXdQXh/dDdCdyyQfftocFAl1FwgAACgkQdCdyyQff tofY6A/9EXGOHE6NCKpxDygy2qCVWFcWesVtj6hg/pwvVm1/GVNP9iVjRG88rLlB FHbawAOF4Rg6PER6/JbdbpIaYhcqOA0YrNBJ80aNZDE1DeBj12zGMo9/bjAKVs2F nFhvPUOfPaGoBK+vlKwGH5PWmEU+DJg6Bl7vbd7eyzoK2D6YUcgHb3jyN9GNQfPZ pTiHHi1+c2p9urjLmrCk8W1ygLV3vk6Xk+SI1H9SWRuAakzMu5IGVBEZz9C2v1fQ yfyldqanC2TpQVGrG+ZU80f4FloiQaaf6ki1mg+8TPRBoIs8gaADa7laphJNZXF9 X/kOz0A8RUq3/LpAXjpwhYSFjbIbABLKR/xhIA60gx8bmhFTZZQ0nyZuHGHTReyq eiRQ+AAchnJ70F/fac2zkls5XOlcJAQs5SDSnN0fmZ3GcQuMV+PpNhj5USPmLmRB VbIWlahjPclddf6ravI9HC8+R0udzzDOu5a3Bt7KG/mg4nP5/Jrec1tI9H+CVNES 3baWC4E1UHSzgQ7B7aWaJxIF570+vskI6vAxJUXh6Qu1VuV4SL7MWGoXiDVS4393 gQ0Nqu/pf0/VWh7KKxlA1zP6Kw2bWWfkX2q6cNX0RejV2r9vJAPwhJUuNDEwybjG vsj3LrpnA77Qxnoo5d68/HsLO8riXmQ/i16zxS7vY6wZwB9BUc0= =idLe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/w0c/BzqVTYOCEszw1tBypyc--