From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9339138334 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F1E0E092C; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C750E0866 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8F120EB0; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:58:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:58:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=vpG+1RwleJ/nmrd0Y66NUKmSCGbqYwp6eWrFbSx7l /g=; b=U4+NytxdvCib+n+N5A4fM2aiwx4FKS3CqQ2lKgrRZdy0at6nbUduC+kBm eQ/349kILuIGdluZqTt61ZWj7hsMg2TZhzbb+EPDAuZmm7U1EeUA+jvto17ppUla eOGZ8UcbIJULk6suUCScR1juO6SIcpHZnPmkSuEDXDazlhy2C46Ed4yzVGYIQyIg SOG43djltGTGCXsp3zFkynBJNGDPf/ckpNJhCBXwhfiLkX0ONo1CZA4XByQGaxqS YVdz7CTJs4RClaqfhbGUat9tj0TzZEmL2H+JTCdCFtW+8vYgizTpT2FB9vaqDCkj s6FoViD2XAWd1qa6txxoOP3wCyddw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrieeigddufeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjggfsehtkeertddtredunecuhfhroh hmpeetlhgvtgcuvfgvnhcujfgrrhhmshgvlhcuoegrlhgvtgesrghlvggtthgvnhhhrghr mhhsvghlrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeduje dvrddvvddvrdelvddruddvkeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlvggtsegr lhgvtghtvghnhhgrrhhmshgvlhdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost.localdomain (172-222-092-128.dhcp.chtrptr.net [172.222.92.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DD6A1E461F; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:58:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:58:13 -0500 From: Alec Ten Harmsel To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Experiences with Flatpak? Message-ID: <20190126195813.GA32545@localhost.localdomain> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Archives-Salt: a7c93fb7-a49c-438f-81a1-2793d5ff7d34 X-Archives-Hash: 78d3efdd8c9bd3392dac2142f1dea586 On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 01:02:39PM -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:48 PM Grant Edwards > wrote: > > > I'm shopping for an IMAP email client that does a decent job of > > handling HTML. After doing a bit of reading I decided the first one > > to try would be Geary. > > I use Thunderbird, it works well. > > > > Is it practical to use flatpak apps on Gentoo? > > > > In my experience is amazing. Gentoo sometimes takes a lot of time to > stabilize some packages; flatpak usually have them immediately. For nightly > builds is even better, since you don't need to pollute your stable system. > > I'm using > > git://github.com/fosero/flatpak-overlay.git > Same here - it works great. I run closed-source freeware like steam, spotify, and discord and don't have any problems. Alec