From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD389138334 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 08:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32584E098F; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 08:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA11CE096C for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 08:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gQTm2-0007zE-Lh for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 08:58:46 +0000 Received: from phoucgh.digimed.co.uk (phoucgh.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.9]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1F5D63B08 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 08:58:45 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 08:58:40 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird compile issue Message-ID: <20181124085840.2f9c1329@phoucgh.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <35804e36-7200-e68e-1314-a42957b788ac@gmail.com> References: <5990a450-3ff9-d264-8a74-0a379f93434c@gmail.com> <20181118104642.a4afum6fbmhcvop6@mew.swordarmor.fr> <3d6df94d-f4fd-0930-a9b9-c30889c299c0@gmail.com> <35804e36-7200-e68e-1314-a42957b788ac@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/+RSauglHsH/XYqXUB=4LbHt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.83.178] Feedback-ID: 82.69.83.178 X-Archives-Salt: 63d5cf2a-38c2-421b-9761-f8c39024fc06 X-Archives-Hash: a8d29d609e1f21f891c5ac62026a320b --Sig_/+RSauglHsH/XYqXUB=4LbHt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 02:29:10 -0600, Dale wrote: > I looked at the build times of both Firefox and Seamonkey, they both > average out to about the same.=C2=A0 For me here, about 1.5 hours.=C2=A0 = Of > course, it varies a bit but that's a rough average.=C2=A0 While genlop -t > shows compile times, it doesn't average them out.=C2=A0 It's just rough i= n my > head quick math.=C2=A0 ;-)=C2=A0 Try genlop -i or qlop -t --=20 Neil Bothwick Walking on water and writing software to specification is easy if they're f= rozen. --Sig_/+RSauglHsH/XYqXUB=4LbHt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEGfLZTV7dXdQXh/dDdCdyyQfftocFAlv5EsAACgkQdCdyyQff tofycRAAoAHW8kYaF2RVS2CLEtKvZvXaJiSgjL4M1jdVklDJZtOFOOk/43JbBZCr Y0lSL0XY9s5nWKPkI4YpBEojVbNqqhWaIJIU3BvdYyuZc/vIyi1Cu94rxn3YckHt MTXNwsRZOdfNA4fV8/uVdFcsRoX/rxhYr+LtnPvMyXSl/bcoE/GC24ray2omjONB bFHp1pjJWSbgE8xD0sH98s4GvRKt9D34KUlatfDroxxV4GSFWzGyzTcPANU2zih0 9PXJ0vF8OSUGrWfOJISin8PQSvLbVuZI5zEAig0TTlbDNKk7xJsDhUnFzwtCUJuQ 568vY8x+e5uAUVI8PtuJ+tTf3PfoVotDgbIv8T0R/dVCN0Jij2bQLA/G6T+xXfUu xinmcCaIvZLteHHUMrfCajhC4dW9I7jHgN1dwdFZgwdQudPZkpZNW3I/k4ZQybwA PzITrtHfO6b+JN307ppbkT9ANIRnQPM8Sa6EEtimSqDVQ431fUu1VZBvzuPAowzb VsoP6f75z8Lrmk1lx0BNRtlf/PQ1JQNMkEYmpioaCbamfIZSjHU1L7nfl8SfhyQd AmdYqw4VgZBhgM5dbFkRTc/lsJLp8ZTBdD4L7kwZEzZT9YO6dIQyk/TxcS6YLTTr RecJgAJOiuQGaZTdyZ66ZzCyXBcyMrxuZCKVogtUHW8FndLSQzk= =1R1F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+RSauglHsH/XYqXUB=4LbHt--