From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7306138334 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 20:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 178BAE08EC; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 20:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95C8FE0878 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 20:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.83.178] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fu1P0-0003lB-Nb for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 20:12:50 +0000 Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EB35762771 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 21:12:49 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 21:12:44 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sys-process/psmisc 23.2 broke Message-ID: <20180826211244.2d1e9241@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/wj7vekYmD=gCnlpL1i3lO/n"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.83.178] Feedback-ID: 82.69.83.178 X-Archives-Salt: 633b0d5a-5dd9-49a7-ace7-59458e9e4eea X-Archives-Hash: e0a9f05ba33f1986a9a352ae4f0008a3 --Sig_/wj7vekYmD=gCnlpL1i3lO/n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 13:34:42 -0400, John Covici wrote: > Hi. 23.2 is broke and has a mandatory new format where you have to > put -s before the signal when using killall. Killall is not finding > existing process even though I have the name correct. Downgrading to > 23.1-r1 fixes the problem. I just thought I'd let people know. The -s does not appear to be mandatory here, it still sends SIGTERM by default. However, I have got a 'no process found' error with some processes, which now require killall `which processname` to work. --=20 Neil Bothwick Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again --Sig_/wj7vekYmD=gCnlpL1i3lO/n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEGfLZTV7dXdQXh/dDdCdyyQfftocFAluDCb0ACgkQdCdyyQff toeeZA/+IC8lp8xEOoGCxDJ5oP/YzVFOH39mK+pw5TjnMO7QAE/HOAxxXEd9ZdLR i68SpOq63+oUf44Bl/Yc+FGTeqdjUht7SJNQDfkMNRdlW6QeRQlL4KozUGEW0BEM hxO/vEW3fVetunNvJilGP9jqTEyBq2BGKoEA6SgcmmPoPpWojl3LfJorZ/oRlBYs 0ij+Q7UxBdIwks+XM52DYx3Wkj3Arj6LL2P2FVHUjemQYlmwGrY7CfzSk6dgQWxX ghnL78gdQ4K2vi40XFmPU0EmIPr2A1e2RLaElB55vCxucyyXVeqzdbHd/88BEfgm Q625MHsOprM2fOjdbrtSlKuDjpOInnj6V82xnr8cjISxEXfsBhQbGrNUtTbV2W8j qqk/fu3xPXdghJIJLw+wC2xAsuDNItrK7pQ/T4uljrXjMee9pw62u708UNVT1GDM bUURa+sG+ZlVWxpNWaW+JehKdymIsap0qKvy425/YBrvo1RD+wHZUeerRY/Lp4AJ uSR/MhrKa/ZTLkerMK8G21Dog+yI0LG0deay6E95K6pDfTUAWx7hDLoMnXnHy1xZ GUbXb0Halx77i4LAZT81I2PyexYcDZYqxA84Z237eQqPeny0KUNqQ6/Su0VSKdIp 5IWJlzwxBSxGUDCPL89WqoRxNyIiDfxpl5O5GsEu8tPVh9KPAcA= =0iTl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wj7vekYmD=gCnlpL1i3lO/n--