From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C0D1381F1 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A44CFE0883; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from very.loosely.org (very.loosely.org [173.255.215.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36656E0809 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.8.78.6] (port=36706 helo=matica.foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fBhQH-0002tZ-Tr for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:58:57 -0700 Received: from itz by matica.foolinux.mooo.com with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1fBhQ9-0000om-M8 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:58:49 -0700 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:58:49 -0700 From: Ian Zimmerman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: APIC Message-ID: <20180426135849.cvqm6phmpjuc4n46@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20180425161507.5prdm67tjanvmlzy@solfire> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180425161507.5prdm67tjanvmlzy@solfire> X-Loosely-Listed: yes User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170707-dirty (1.8.3) X-Archives-Salt: 4eccf96e-7c54-42ae-a0ff-3778d1e8f3fb X-Archives-Hash: 0d44d2ceb4dc47cf7df05fc7c20ce793 On 2018-04-25 18:15, tuxic@posteo.de wrote: > how can I determine, whether I have a 8-bit APIC ... or what else? Why? There was some discussion of this on the list. Some posters said there was a kernel option that made kernels deal better with 16-bit (or wider?) APICs. But, by my reading of the kernel documentation, the cited option really did and does something else. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.