From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF591382C5 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 15:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45AEFE0901; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 15:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from very.loosely.org (very.loosely.org [173.255.215.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1B1CE086D for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 15:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.8.78.6] (port=50646 helo=matica.foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f07I4-0006VZ-0R for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 08:10:36 -0700 Received: from itz by matica.foolinux.mooo.com with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f07Hx-0003w9-NQ for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 08:10:29 -0700 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 08:10:29 -0700 From: Ian Zimmerman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: New xorg-proto package blocks everything else. Message-ID: <20180325151029.epicfhzrdwrx3h22@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20180325135045.78a46753@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180325135045.78a46753@digimed.co.uk> X-Loosely-Listed: yes User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170707-dirty (1.8.3) X-Archives-Salt: 51d5b97c-3b02-441a-bad5-b2595c39bc4c X-Archives-Hash: 67c7dcf49643d2ac0a587bb4d8ebc595 On 2018-03-25 13:50, Neil Bothwick wrote: > The only hard block here appears to be xscrnsaverproto, unmerge that and > the rest should take care of themselves. I had all the soft blocks today > but not that one, and everything worked fine. But ... I actually have packages that depend on scrnsaverproto: matica!524 ~# equery d scrnsaverproto * These packages depend on scrnsaverproto: x11-base/xorg-server-1.19.5-r1 (>=x11-proto/scrnsaverproto-1.1) x11-libs/libXScrnSaver-1.2.2-r1 (>=x11-proto/scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]) x11-misc/xautolock-2.2_p5_p1 (x11-proto/scrnsaverproto) x11-misc/xssstate-1.1 (x11-proto/scrnsaverproto) So I have to unmerge xautolock and xssstate too? That will be painful because they're baked deep into my X configuration. I think it will require a trip to the Linux console :-P -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.