From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7299B1382C5 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 097D5E0B9B; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9032DE0ABA for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [81.108.251.46] (helo=mail.digimed.co.uk) by smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1enqfU-0000A4-Lx for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:00:04 +0000 Received: from digimed.co.uk (fenchurch.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.6]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3337D66D76 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:00:04 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:59:57 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk build failure and masking confusion Message-ID: <20180219185957.7226eaa6@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3698f8fd-6b1a-c2ff-d204-1f41787b6027@sys-concept.com> References: <87371zt86n.fsf@nyu.edu> <4876333.DpMW1yWErG@dell_xps> <87371y71do.fsf@nyu.edu> <3698f8fd-6b1a-c2ff-d204-1f41787b6027@sys-concept.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/sKLiLVLkb63oGMfUTziCr4Y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-smarthost03a-IP: [81.108.251.46] Feedback-ID: 81.108.251.46 X-Archives-Salt: d4c52137-bb64-4fc4-abe9-13b5f62b4643 X-Archives-Hash: 06705e9cd98e34d8f74c22e21c7ac082 --Sig_/sKLiLVLkb63oGMfUTziCr4Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:05:37 -0700, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote: > It is a good point. Why Gentoo developers marked or allow to mark > gnucash-2.7 branch stable in portage when the developers > https://www.gnucash.org/download.phtml did not mark it STABLE The key phrase there is "stable in portage". Not whether it is suitable or not for any particular use. If the ebuild is considered stable, it should be marked as such. --=20 Neil Bothwick furbling, v.: Having to wander through a maze of ropes at an airport or bank even when you are the only person in line. -- Rich Hall, "Sniglets" --Sig_/sKLiLVLkb63oGMfUTziCr4Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE8k9T/rX16EJxEKG692eFu0QSMJgFAlqLHq4ACgkQ92eFu0QS MJhMYxAAvr06Whi3CVKISoNQyvyt2Ctg8aUptbar7uJSAEUK3DvzGQLHVS3+tVpX ssd9z+KYG//ISQtljpswUHzSHBi00GhUYPyuHkCeuDjyFownPpYTDB9MKP+X2+r4 yCHaaBi3lwwwNBccT3rHsdMXQLTPpH50oDd8aRNFb/sJuUcarAy4sNG0d6DPEYp4 S1lcfX2BmoClaIBxJImJwBtwQHEWkOmqmCWTmnnAdsolajJc3/RPleo6o2AF4fFt lsjopAmK+cPyPOtTpDT7ImRJvbgyxbBv0uy365Bqr1FBvUIWKTrMEA/XnW15LNez ol1Fq1feaIEX5a0ETLnL4jcz6B3B00SWmCUrbpTifcgM+/OPHECuhFVTtuJ4wk5f KQ5eJqDSn6oTmKpG41QLPEAiBDe8ih2Cnl3/jyTG2I2rqCxG+jkwhqHSbfcXBHda TTedz+7lDy08gZ7pIeULXCBPhT1JS6/+HTTgCnRgxKPsEWy1sdJHupWk1+gUd/CM EXuEJmxLXKqyOo+s7I3oqPavRJl/MhoQJzJS/rGf2GPuS5ZB1phhKHeSNt6r2cfd x7QlP7jsOcy2bgwuWznfKomQK+T/3S3qSkjV9992BRXc6aQyWzbRY9Jf3HsJJ/vc vzJ8coe9Ylh9K5ON+S0MYZ/wGUJhkPd3EfpakHrWDPvPbTxL+1E= =kIBE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/sKLiLVLkb63oGMfUTziCr4Y--